New facade paint has cracks

I will respect your opinion, but you cannot call that a defect no matter how BIG and RED you write it.
If you want to spray in an urban area where houses stand next to each other and street traffic runs right by, and the wind blows the spray so that neighboring houses and vehicles get splattered, what do you explain to those affected? Furthermore, you do not prevent increased material deposit in the recesses of a rough render. If there is also appropriate temperature with low humidity or warm wind, then you have a very fast skin or film formation that dries from the surface toward the plaster and causes such spots. What I see in the picture is the only thing I can assess and it is absolutely acceptable and not a defect. You always talk about cracks that are actually only film spots and do not even penetrate the last coating.
The substrate is completely wetted as far as can be seen in the picture. The coating is technically fully functional. Again, very slowly, I quote the colleague Martin Kempf in essence:
“The surface to be assessed should be viewed from the usual distance under normal lighting. Usual distance for façades means, for example, the opposite side of the street.”
This can be read in full in BAU E section Interior and Exterior Plaster
Technical article by Martin Kempf.
I add from:
“Guideline for the visual assessment of coated surfaces” from
Working group of experts in the Bavarian painter and varnisher trade.
There it says on page 30:
“Faintly visible drying shrinkage cracks in the recesses of strongly rough surfaces are to be accepted as long as they do not impair the technical functionality.
Exceptions are coating systems that are intended to eliminate cracks in the substrate.
Fine cracks in these areas represent acceptable irregularities.
Assessment principles: page 8
“The inspection is generally to be carried out at the distance corresponding to usual use.
Usual use does not always have to correspond to actual use. If possible, the distance of 1 meter should not be undercut during the assessment.
In the evaluation it must be taken into account that irregularities are unavoidable in every craft work.”
That should be enough now, or do you also doubt the guidelines? Then apparently the authors of this work are even more incompetent than you.

Of course, I assumed two coats of paint! Because I am not one of those painters who just slap on one thick coat and call it done, even if you apparently want to show everyone reading along that all painters, except you of course, belong to that kind of craftsman! In a broader sense, you can even assume three coats from me if you consider the hydroprimer as a coat when followed by a silicone resin paint, or the priming with silicate primer followed by a silicate paint. By the way, when spraying, a second person has to roll it out afterwards, and in hot weather it’s not guaranteed that they can avoid these superficial drying cracks!