New facade paint has cracks

Apples and pears

If you now bring the comparison with plaster and fillers into play regarding organic facade paint, then you can also tell Schubeck that the lamb leg needs to be ready in 10 minutes and not in 70 minutes, since the salmon fillet didn’t take any longer either.
You’re mixing things up tremendously!
I’ll leave your assessment of the Sto consultant uncommented.
I once had a painter journeyman, 45 years old, whom I sent to paint windows; before he could start, I just made it in time to stop him.
When I asked what he intended to apply there, he said, "well, Glasurit window paint!" Glasurit was indeed in the pot, but it was liquid plastic. I just wanted to mention that in passing with 30 years of professional experience. Furthermore, these are not cracks in the sense of cracks, but rather skin flaking. Even cracks in plaster with a grain size of 3 mm and a width of 0.2 mm still do not represent a defect.
But as they say so nicely on the Rhine: "Everyone is different!"
In my expert reports, such skin flaking is not considered a defect!
By the way, I have been doing my job for 44 years, almost 36 of them as a master craftsman, and for 13 years I have been working as an expert.
But I don’t want to convert you; believe what you want to believe.
You shall have my blessing in God’s name as well.

I don't know where you get this wisdom that cracked surfaces are completely fine. For me, this is definitely not a professional execution of the work. How do you want to explain to the customer that one side is good and one side has cracks in the paint? I'm curious about that. Hopefully, you won’t be appointed as an expert for Ulfi then.

Speculation

This is not about cracked surfaces, but superficially minimal skin splits. You haven't even seen the other walls or are you the reincarnation of Hanussen? So you base everything on assumptions. Furthermore, when assessing, the usual distance of 2-3m must be maintained; here the distance is about 20-30 cm. Under the microscope, these splits then look like the Amazon. Loosen the reins a bit, otherwise the horses might start galloping through.

Hello, I think they wanted to paint over the cracks closely to seal them.
Regarding Schwarzmeier again. I have not seen the other walls and assumed that the defects listed here were not present there. Which is quite strange. Maybe the expert could give a statement on this. Regarding your statement that the work should be inspected from 2-3 meters away is, of course, the joke of the century. No one can tell me as a customer from what distance I should inspect the work carried out. Surely I see the overall impression of a painted wall better from a certain distance than if I stand right in front of it. But the details should definitely be examined up close.

Best regards, thommi

hello everyone,

what do you think is the reason that the painting company painted the facade an additional time for free?

The question should be answered by the painting company, otherwise one gets even more into the area of "ASSUMPTION", == not KNOWING!
@THOMMI
The watchmaker has a very short "usual viewing distance"!

hello everyone,

what do you think is the reason that the painting company painted the facade an additional time for free?

The question should be answered by the painting company, otherwise one gets even more into the area of "ASSUMPTION", == not KNOWING!

The watchmaker has a very short "usual viewing distance"!

Schwarzmeier, it was clear to me that you had nothing more to add to this. You’re probably at the end of your expert jargon. If a company redoes a job for free, the reason is pretty obvious!!!! They wanted to fix their botch.

Regarding the statement "ASSUMPTION", == not KNOWING!
Statement by Ulfi "So part of it is paid for, the part that the company executed correctly."

Why should I doubt that?

Regards Thommi