Narrow plot, max possibilities, single-family house with low knee wall

  • Erstellt am 2019-08-27 20:33:33

kaho674

2019-08-28 12:05:31
  • #1
Can you explain the ridge direction more precisely? "Along the property" is not exactly enlightening, since the property is everywhere.

If I look at the neighboring buildings, there doesn't seem to be any restriction regarding depth. What is missing in width just comes in length. But I do find it doable.

But without exact measurements and a possibly existing building plot, this is pointless guessing.
 

Subwkloofer

2019-08-28 12:36:38
  • #2
The ridge direction is predetermined as shown in the example from Escroda below on page 1. The plan so far is the survey plan, that is correct.
 

ypg

2019-08-28 12:36:52
  • #3


To the street. Many streets have this requirement, and it also makes sense here.

On 8.5 x 12 there is the classic design with utility room and office on the ground floor, entrance here from the street. The living room adjoins the garage and faces west, kitchen and dining open to the south.
Again: where is the problem?
With a 50 degree roof utilization you are brushing against the two-story height. With a dormer on the south for two rooms or a raised bay window certainly. The building authority offers an exception. It's all great.
 

Escroda

2019-08-28 16:48:31
  • #4
No, precisely not. Exactly here. The house must be gable-end to the street, so you have a long eaves side and a short gable side, which means a lot of area is limited by sloping roofs. Therefore, my suspicion is that the approval authority will allow full-story dormers. Take my plan from #6 and make a small deduction; so 8.5m * 12m is definitely possible, IMO also 14m depth. The blue line is the building boundary; to the south or sideways there is none.
 

Strahleman

2019-08-28 17:07:45
  • #5
What does the development plan say about the maximum number of floors? We are building on a similar footprint (7.8x11.8m) with knee wall/dwarf wall at 0.00m. In a few rooms, we have planned large dormers (almost Bauhaus style), which especially brings the entire bathroom up to full room height. That should also be feasible for you if 0.5m knee wall and 50° roof pitch are not enough. Something livable should definitely be possible on your plot.
 

ypg

2019-08-28 17:22:49
  • #6


I don't see any negative aspect in that
Better that way than the other way around.
 

Similar topics
16.07.2016Purchase Agreement for Land - Building Window - Preliminary Building Inquiry12
12.10.2016Kniestock lowered afterwards34
25.04.2018Kniestock Danwood House in Schleswig-Holstein - What is the maximum possible?23
02.07.2019Purlin distance from exterior wall or roof16
27.08.2019Building plan stipulates knee wall is inadmissible16
30.09.2019Floor plan optimization of a single-family house with a basement on a small plot178
30.10.2019Increase knee wall height - exceed eaves height?22
27.12.2019Low ridge height results in a low knee wall55
25.02.2020Assessment of property sought - Article 34 redevelopment11
13.05.2020Single-family house 11.35x9.65 floor plan and placement on the property29
05.10.2020Questions about the development plan (full floors, knee wall)11
02.09.2020Can a single-family house be sensibly planned on this plot?14
19.10.2020Street about 50cm above the property - backfill or basement24
18.03.2021Floor plan of a single-family house approx. 170 m² on a narrow 750 m² plot59
01.11.2021Trapezoidal plot - house placement?23
25.05.2023Plot Single-family house New development area60
20.05.2023Large dormers or high knee wall?33
27.06.2023How to achieve Bremer 2/3 solution with high knee wall?13
21.01.2024Arrangement of a single-family house on a small trapezoidal plot36
24.04.2024Building with a knee wall of 50 cm?29

Oben