: I am a mathematician and not an artist. I probably couldn't distinguish a house with an "a-basic idea" from a house without one, but I am willing to learn.
: nordanney I just sent you a private message because of the family reasons.
So let's go all the way back, namely to the starting thread, and keep things in perspective. What was requested was a ground floor with all the necessary rooms, accessible without stairs or changing floors. nothing more and nothing less. As already recognized, the topic "barrier-free" is nothing extraordinary, but it gets more interesting with "wheelchair accessible." Now, one could accuse every builder of building "wheelchair accessible" right away, since one gets older, could have an accident tomorrow, or could suddenly find themselves in that situation without any involvement. My background might suggest these things, but nothing more.
I admit the upper floor is a compromise of many considerations. We deliberately removed the children's bathroom because we don't want two bathrooms on the floor. I know what the bathroom looked like back in the days for my sisters, and changing floors has never hurt anyone. Similar to the discussion about laundry chutes yes/no. We canceled that as well.
What I didn't quite understand is where you see a difference between upper floor and basement. Even if I imagine 2 children's rooms in the basement, I still have to realize a staircase hallway, 3 doors, 1x granny flat and 2x children's rooms? But I also have to confess, we currently have no definite plan as to whether and how we will rent out (holiday apartment, permanent rental, weekend commuters, single, couple).
The tight schedule is not from us, but we are not entirely opposed to it. Our architect would quite like to still get the 2015 stamp.
: Gladly here in the forum or by email?