But I assumed that the standard land values were recorded anonymously based on real sales (land transfer tax registration?). This should already include the reservations location, quality, popularity of the area, etc. Nevertheless, a discrepancy remains.
Furthermore, the values were probably recorded on different reference dates, so there could be almost a one-year recording lag between the values of neighboring parcels.
In addition, the recording scheme and adjustments may vary depending on the federal state.
More precisely, the basis for the standard land values actually comes from the notarial contracts! An example regarding the discrepancy:
- BRW Zone 123 with a BRW of €220, adjacent new development area sold for €380-400
- large "building gap" sold for €523
This actually happened and I even know the buyer personally; the price is real (so there were no unknown circumstances). However, it is highly unlikely that the BRW will now be adjusted to €500 since only a single purchase exists. Without the new development area, nothing might happen at all; the new area probably causes a clearer increase. The problem with the BRW is mainly that there are often zones where nothing is sold for a long time, so you do not perceive the market development for this area and then suddenly much higher prices are paid.