@pagoni2020
To ask why something doesn't pay off and suddenly should just because politics changes a parameter,...and to ask why a difference in the building envelope and thus a greater heating energy demand should make no difference.
Some might even maliciously say that you only need to promote what hardly anyone would buy otherwise. That is why I deliberately use electric cars as an example.
At the latest, the annual performance factor values create facts here.
With photovoltaics, no efficiency will change anymore, as space research has been working on this for too long. Lithium batteries are completely excluded.
My recommendation for action would first depend on whether a gas connection exists at all, which heat pump is to be used with which annual performance factor, and which subsidies are involved.
Otherwise, the leeway here is limited with KfW55, so I would always tend towards the most optimal building envelope possible, because the current heating technology is far too fragile to last long. A look at China, which is about 5 years ahead here, shows what will be possible in the future with hydrogen.
@Musketier
Forget the heating costs; those are sales figures, the space heating load is decisive here.