The craftsmen working with the general contractor here all had a key for the construction locks.
...because the same locks are installed in all the front doors by the construction company. That’s why the locking system or the key is very expensive: if one gets into the wrong hands or is lost, then all the locks on all construction sites have to be replaced.
Only after the completion of the interior trades is the correct locking system installed, for which there are then, for example, only 3 keys for the owner.
If he hands over the official key to the unique locking system to you before the handover,
it could be that he is making use of a tacit acceptance. Warranty claims of course do not expire, but there would then be no handover protocol with the defects.
However, I cannot imagine that a reputable contractor would make such an offer and later refuse the official final acceptance including a defect list.
However, I have to say that we also received this construction key like the craftsmen. We exchanged it through the responsible party at the final acceptance.
Tacit acceptance is usually talked about when you have already moved into the house by placing some furniture, tools, etc. inside. We took possession of our storage room so that we could store the equipment and paints for the work we were doing ourselves. When our construction manager saw this, he smirked and said something like: “Oops, you have already accepted the house.” Upon inquiry, he then explained it to us.
So I would decide that based on the general relationship of trust—and also on what advantages you should then have.
That’s my amateur opinion on this, regards Yvonne
P.s. For a final handover, signatures belong by the way—and separately the signature for the key handover