Interpret building plan / is it even feasible?

Thanks for your opposing opinion. By the way, in the same time that I have been in the green forum, I have given about sixteen times as much advice here (not least because, in my opinion, the ratio of puppy protection to earnest and competent help here is structured much more kindly). And I hope you also understand my perspective: as a non-smoker, you give advice free of charge during your cigarette breaks, and someone who really badly needs it makes the extra effort to clean up the basics of essential information. That does make you feel a bit fooled.

What I made illegible was irrelevant to my question.

I assume the reply from Franz Josef Strauß is known :)

You’re not the first to get a reprimand from @11ant for anonymization of any kind, even if he rarely flips out like that. No idea where that tic comes from.

The tic is much more about painstakingly cleaning image files (which even the most desperate property seeker does not have scanned under the names of development plans) of necessary details. I find distrust towards helpers "not nice," and I also say that clearly.

Generally, everyone here is quite nice and wants to help, even if it sometimes doesn’t seem that way at first.
Even the elephant, if you don’t accidentally trigger it :)

I gladly admit that I don’t casually guess missing information in the text as does (and therefore need comparatively more substrate in order to help).

For all laypeople and newcomers, such a reaction is quite discouraging and makes the sense and purpose of such a forum absurd. I don’t even want to ask my questions here anymore.

Oh come on. I’m really very nice, see? "here writes 11ant" ...

For all laypeople and newcomers, such a reaction is quite discouraging and renders the purpose and meaning of such a forum absurd. I don't even want to ask my questions here anymore.

‍♀️ . Whatever. I wanted to log out and found out that it doesn't work.

‍♀. Whatever. I wanted to log out and realized that it does not work.

It's a shame that you're not allowed to be helped.

Thank you for your opposing opinion. By the way, in the same time that I have already been in the green forum, I have given roughly sixteen times as much advice here (not least because, in my opinion, the ratio of newbie protection to effortful and competent help here is much friendlier). And I hope you also understand my perspective: as a non-smoker, you give advice free of charge during your cigarette breaks, and someone who really needs it makes the extra effort to clean up the basics of essential information. That makes you feel like you're being taken for a fool.

I assume Franz Josef Strauß’s reply is known :)

The issue is much more about laboriously "cleaning" image files (which even the most desperate property seeker does not scan by the names of development plans) of necessary details. I find distrust towards helpers "not nice", and I say that clearly as well.

I gladly admit that I don't casually pull missing information from a crystal ball like (and therefore need comparatively more substrate to be able to help).

Oh come on. I'm really quite nice, see "here writes 11ant" ...

I have not disguised any important information. I have adhered to the forum rules. But it doesn't matter. I cannot delete my post, otherwise I would have done it long ago.

It's all about the tone. And if the OP has followed the guidelines for publishing image material (see above), then it's all the more unfair to accuse him of something like that. That is just my opinion.

I found your reaction more than exaggerated. And no, I do not find the anonymized information relevant for the first time. In times of hardly any available building plots, it is more than understandable that certain information is "omitted". Otherwise, I expect a well-founded reason why that should be relevant for feedback. At first, I really thought "did he forget his pill". Your answers, hints, and suggestions are otherwise extremely helpful. Thanks for that!