KarstenausNRW
2023-06-28 18:39:48
- #1
The only one who does not compare apples and oranges. You say that cold rent – money that is simply gone and not building assets – should be compared with an annuity. So apples with oranges. As a non-saving tenant, I have exactly €0 assets after 30 years. If I spend the same amount on interest AND repayment for a home of my own, after 30 years I have a paid-off home worth half a million or whatever on the asset side. And that’s an unequal comparison. It only evens out if the tenant also saves = the homeowner’s annuity. The correct comparison is therefore: cold rent to interest payment. While the borrower benefits from the fact that his interest payment decreases every month, the tenant’s rent regularly increases. And yes, you also have to save for a home of your own. But the costs for a new heating system and a new roof have to be covered by you as a tenant just the same. That’s called rent increase ;-) When it comes to the new heating or new roof (with insulation), the costs are then passed on to you on top of the usual rent increase.That’s a pretty odd calculation with the interest = cold rent. Because as a tenant, I am not forced to build up assets of 300, 400, 500,000 EUR through repayment.