And to get back to the question. Material markups of 100 percent are not uncommon. Often even more. Much more.
Material markups of 100 percent and more may apply to small parts, but certainly not to material that is carted onto the construction site by the pallet. Especially not if I can possibly check what the craftsman (or let's say in this case crook ;-) ) pays my colleagues for it.
As long as you don’t know the +X%, no one can tell you what you COULD save. Without any details on the project/material, no one can tell you what you could save on painters and so on. It’s all nonsense that way.
That’s why I also asked for a rule of thumb along the lines of: “What does the material cost approximately for a shell construction of 200,000 euros?” If it were 100,000 euros, I could estimate: 100,000 euros equal mason equity + 25% markup + 19% VAT, so I would pay xx.xxx euros less for the same material.
I have to start somewhere and eliminate a few unknowns at least partially. Hence the assumptions above of 600,000 euros for a standard single-family house with around 150 sqm turnkey in price-performance winner execution, so without golden faucets, but they can be from (Hans) Grohe.
Plus the statement from the building materials market manager, assuming that it’s possible with the material and if the craftsman charges a “handling fee,” then you can discuss that. He doesn’t have to pay invoices for that, has less accounting effort, and no capital tie-up.
And X0,000 euros savings through cheaper material, help from relatives, and EL versus turnkey construction can tip the scales significantly toward the east.
But I’ll ask a friend of my mother, who is (quote my mother) “an architect without a diploma” with 35 years of experience as a draftswoman and is really getting deeply involved in my brother’s plans right now. Maybe she has some figures or rules of thumb.
Thanks to you all!