parcus
2020-06-24 08:55:18
- #1
I don't find that unimportant at all, at least I don't know of any perimeter insulation that is not compressive resistant.
A flat rate only works with the poor thermal bridge surcharge of 0.10 W/(m² K).
This often already ruins a KfW55, which should be worthwhile just because of the higher subsidy. And moisture protection is not proven this way either.
I only use such measures in monument protection if nothing else is really possible, or if garages are located inside the house or stairs lead to unheated basements. It becomes very difficult to improve a thermal bridge afterwards. But often the blower door test also becomes a problem there.
A flat rate only works with the poor thermal bridge surcharge of 0.10 W/(m² K).
This often already ruins a KfW55, which should be worthwhile just because of the higher subsidy. And moisture protection is not proven this way either.
I only use such measures in monument protection if nothing else is really possible, or if garages are located inside the house or stairs lead to unheated basements. It becomes very difficult to improve a thermal bridge afterwards. But often the blower door test also becomes a problem there.