On the left side of the plan is where the garden of the house currently under construction will be, so we can actually just wait and see what they plant there.
It seems to me that all of these are multi-family houses around you?! The planting at the top of the plan also looks more like coincidence to me. There's a sand path running along there, right? In that case, if the left side of the plan is also a multi-family house, why would they spend money on planting along the roadside, which also involves work?
Unfortunately, I don’t understand that. Can you try to describe it differently?
[ATTACH alt="Screenshot 2024-05-26 at 15.59.58.png"]85932[/ATTACH] As you can see from the red arrows: if you look straight ahead, the property boundary is closer than when the eye is guided diagonally through planting. This is achieved through planting. You basically sacrifice the corners for planting and then have more "depth" in the area. The black arrow in this case is the connection between the terrace/garden, while on the left and top of the plan from the main garden is the clustered planting.
Yes, but I had also already read that gardens with only lawn appear smaller. Hence the search for a bit of inspiration.
Hmm, I tried to illustrate something, but it’s difficult when you know nothing about the residents (kids or family, dog or cat). Also, the preferences for what the garden is to be used for are not known. A sunbathing lawn for sun lovers? That seems to be on the third floor? Or should it become a fire pit, climbing frame, or sandbox?