Tego12
2020-01-06 20:30:40
- #1
Of course, it is partly subjective... We have tiles in the bathrooms and hallway, the rest is parquet, so a good comparison is possible. The parquet is always significantly more pleasant to walk on in terms of both temperature and feel. The heating is naturally the same everywhere on or off.
Especially during the transition period, when the underfloor heating is completely off, the tiles are not pleasantly tempered (of course, you can manage somehow, but it is definitely much more comfortable), while the parquet is very pleasant to walk on. How should it work otherwise... The floor covering can at most reach room temperature without running underfloor heating. Due to the high thermal conductivity of tiles, you notice the temperature immediately.
If anyone wants to tell me that 22-degree warm tiles are really pleasant to walk on without slippers, I would also recommend showering at 22 degrees, that saves a lot of energy (example is flawed, of course).
Especially during the transition period, when the underfloor heating is completely off, the tiles are not pleasantly tempered (of course, you can manage somehow, but it is definitely much more comfortable), while the parquet is very pleasant to walk on. How should it work otherwise... The floor covering can at most reach room temperature without running underfloor heating. Due to the high thermal conductivity of tiles, you notice the temperature immediately.
If anyone wants to tell me that 22-degree warm tiles are really pleasant to walk on without slippers, I would also recommend showering at 22 degrees, that saves a lot of energy (example is flawed, of course).