and under the category "what I wouldn’t do again," the staircase landing has never come up.
I also didn’t criticize the staircase landing itself, but that it is so built in. It is not central, it is located to the side of the hallway and according to the drawing, it is simply there and hiding. Since a staircase plays an important role in a single-family house, you should somehow be able to sense it when entering the house, as many paths also lead upstairs immediately.
The thing is, we want a long house because the south side is really nice and unbuildable. A square house is also nice,
I didn’t say anything against long houses either. It’s not just black and white when the saturation of black is criticized.
There are many long houses that are a bit friendlier, also with a staircase in the hallway and without echo.
In principle, a straight staircase fits better in a narrow house. This naturally results in a different hallway structure.
And above all, do you buy new furniture every week that has to be carried upstairs?
The question is nonsense. Moving a chair or a dresser to another floor once in a while is not uncommon. The 2-meter ladder or carrying the sleeping child to bed…
In summer everyone has the blinds down because the sun shines in too much.
As I said: it’s not just black and white, you combine elements, and in the planning there is more than one way to equip a long house with a long hallway, to permanently keep out the sun by means of an extreme canopy, and so on.
I can’t understand old-fashioned at all, what is modern then?
You are the one who used that word.
I do think the architect should draw what the client wants.
We then couldn’t see the forest for the trees anymore.
.. and now the architect is supposed to draw your trees, even though you, as you yourself say, were overwhelmed?!
Let’s just take the architectural highlight of this house, namely the cubature: here you can immediately see that the layman doesn’t know how to use projections, overhangs, or other facade design to reduce the massiveness or clumsiness.
The architect is not even asked whether everything could be designed nicer – he simply draws your trees and at the end of the day trees come out, but no forest, even though with many rehearsed elements and knowledge of how it could be better realized, a great house, i.e. a beautiful forest, could be designed. But you don’t ask for that at all. You provide the architect with trees and he draws trees. And if you now also want to make the architect change the forum knowledge, then as a mere draftsman he will no longer want to provide his knowledge to you.
For the layman, a forest consists of trees; for the expert, it consists of different planting up to clearings and terrain modeling, stones, etc., so that the residents feel comfortable there in many situations.