Ben_des
2024-03-26 16:19:43
- #1
You should also show that the ground floor (EG) is missing here and causing confusion.
The ground floor is currently identical to the upper floor. Therefore, I did not mention it separately.
By far the (dangerously!) too high item is the estimation inaccuracy. It is in the six-figure range here!
I therefore strongly advise you to plan very precisely. Many renovation clients (and their old-building-inexperienced architects) build on the basic misconception that performance phase 1 can be ticked off as a mere formality in existing buildings. The opposite is true; the effort is rather multiple times compared to new construction. Otherwise, you have to put "maybe" in front of every item and "or double that" behind it. Although this is not yet the worst case, it usually evens out in this magnitude.
We will do the exact planning after measuring tomorrow. Which effort is multiple compared to new construction? Performance phase 1 or in general?
In the original thread, everyone recommended renovating because new construction would be "financial suicide." Not anymore?
Record and describe the status and measures very precisely!
Also, the energy consultant should clearly state which conditions apply regarding the subsidies for each measure.
Good point, thanks!
I currently lack the time to recap, but most of what I said in your old thread will also apply in the changed project horizon. At least I don't feel the need to write more here today.
What do you mean still applies?
There it was essentially about the question: new construction or renovation.
Best regards