Floor plan for "mid sized tiny house" / Single-family house with nearly 100 sqm

why a square house and not a more elongated bungalow?

[ATTACH alt="Arcacia Haus.PNG"]53365[/ATTACH]

the garage would then be the utility room, the washing machine is in the plan adjacent to the garage.

Because such a house costs twice as much as a typical one

Because such a house costs twice as much as a standard one

Yes, sure, the example house does. But in principle, I do agree with on that: Bungalow, and naturally rather elongated. The basic model roughly "Type " (the small corner merely due to the floor area ratio can of course be omitted) ;-)

Thank you, dear ones.

I am not alone and we really want to build with our chosen provider because we like the houses there by far the best. However, the bungalows there would actually be more expensive.

For me, it would be completely fine to live only downstairs, even in our small house, if it is possible to arrange everything sensibly there (and a small 10sqm room is enough for me).
I am still hoping for the architect, but we will only start with them once we can finally buy the plot (the soil surveyor is coming this Thursday or Friday this week!).

It all depends on one person, the budget is limited.

Therefore, a bungalow is out of the question.

Bungalow eine etwas komfortablere Garage: okay, Nicht-Fachfrau-Beweis überzeugend erbracht :)

:-) Is it really that unreasonable for a non-expert to assume that building outwards might be cheaper than building upwards? Still, I fully agree with you. :)

Sure, the example house is fine. But basically, I do agree with : bungalow, and of course rather elongated. The basic model roughly "Type " (the slight corner due to the floor area ratio can be left out) ;-)

It doesn’t matter now whether elongated or square, since the OP is not convinced about a bungalow.

It all depends on one person, the budget is limited.

We really want to build with our chosen provider because we like their houses by far the best. But the bungalows there would actually be more expensive.

Therefore, a bungalow is out of the question.

You do realize what you are writing, don’t you?

In the end, you (one person) or you all

I’m not alone

have to know what you’re building. Not us.

But if you are already ill and can’t manage as before, then it’s pure nonsense to take on a burden that is quite expensive, i.e., a house with barrier-free design. And on top of that, to take a home builder who is probably somewhat more expensive overall.
And if it depends on the other person, then I would seriously consider whether I want to build with them if my physical limitations are not taken into account.
Personally, I would always be willing to compromise, but when it comes to illness, the fun stops.

"chronisch krank" can mean anything and I haven’t read anything so far about what it actually is. But if I hear that the house has hardly been left recently, then it does seem to have something to do with walking. Under this condition, however, neither the bathroom nor the stairs are even remotely planned in a sensible way.