11ant
2019-03-04 00:57:41
- #1
When someone here is asked for a "site plan," they do not mean zooming into the property so much that you can see nothing on it except at which edge the street borders it. Nevertheless, one recognizes ...
... but at least as false. The conclusion "no relevant restrictions" may - at least without contour lines - be correct. In the usage template, cut off on the left side of the image in #27, two full floors are permitted, a floor area ratio of 0.4 and a floor space index of 0.6 (multiplied by 638 sqm, so indeed not restrictive in that respect). But it is clear that there is a development plan - and one should take a closer look at it (and not only at the image part).
I have "placed" the house; I estimate the property to be about 25.70 x 24.80 m (depth/width).
I consider your concern justified. Ceiling thickness or floor structure - the planner probably forgot one of the two in the calculation.
Development plan/restrictions: no relevant restrictions for our project
Size of the property 638 sqm
... but at least as false. The conclusion "no relevant restrictions" may - at least without contour lines - be correct. In the usage template, cut off on the left side of the image in #27, two full floors are permitted, a floor area ratio of 0.4 and a floor space index of 0.6 (multiplied by 638 sqm, so indeed not restrictive in that respect). But it is clear that there is a development plan - and one should take a closer look at it (and not only at the image part).
I have "placed" the house; I estimate the property to be about 25.70 x 24.80 m (depth/width).
RFB 2.75 on the upper floor? How thick is your ceiling between ground floor and upper floor supposed to be? With RFB 0.00 on the ground floor, there won’t be much clear room height, or am I mistaken?
I consider your concern justified. Ceiling thickness or floor structure - the planner probably forgot one of the two in the calculation.