Floor plan critique - Single-family house on a hill

  • Erstellt am 2018-03-01 23:12:07

ruppsn

2018-03-14 10:48:32
  • #1
I’m already past that for biological reasons [emoji4] But okay, yes, I might have come across as annoyed, because I was, since posts like that seem very preachy to me. I just can’t understand how some people feel called to butt in on two slightly off-topic posts. If you’re not interested, please just skip those 2 (!) posts—without commenting. I would fully understand if it had gotten out of hand, but with 2 posts? For me, the proportionality just doesn’t fit, which actually annoyed me a bit. Sorry. How do you reflect on your posts? But maybe let’s just leave it at that... otherwise it will get really off-topic... You can check your own part in this (no offense). As the saying goes: the opposite of well-intentioned is well done [emoji6]
 

11ant

2018-03-15 00:24:58
  • #2

The funny thing about the pun is: in my neighboring district, they actually fly the MYK flag


With a pedant allergy, you should actually be getting my stronger migraine attacks
 

Frederick76

2018-04-12 20:05:45
  • #3
Hi everyone,
attached is once again a sign of life from the original poster.
In recent weeks, financing discussions and talks with the energy consultant regarding KfW 40 Plus have been the topic.
Work on the design and changes will continue next week.
I will not comment on the off-topic discussions regarding the way of life – everyone has their own ideas here; I found some posts here somewhat over-interpreted as a critique of the floor plan in that direction...

Based on YPG’s suggestion, attached is a rendered offset shed roof. We are currently considering how best to access the children’s rooms with the extended attic space.

The rest of the changes will follow from next week.

Best regards,
Fred



 

Karlstraße

2018-04-12 21:35:34
  • #4
I am curious! What have the KfW discussions brought?
 

Karlstraße

2018-04-12 21:36:35
  • #5
 
Oben