Floor plan city villa 150 m² Opinions and criticism

I would be very much in favor of swapping the kitchen and the study and planning a terrace access from the kitchen but that doesn't really help the overall quite botched floor plan. , I need ~105cm height and my husband ~115cm, I am 179cm and he is 193cm ;) if you have long legs like me the working height has to be higher (but most of the time the home builders actually don't think enough about that)

As far as word choice is concerned, I would be grateful for a little more radio discipline.

Nevertheless, I would like to explain the meaning:

The heating works even without constantly holding its hand. You have to go to a fuse box once in a blue moon. And you don’t exactly transfer laundry from the machine to the dryer next to it when a visitor needs to step out.

So if you sacrifice the dispensable shower in this toilet (which brings more joy in the bathroom) and place the washing machine and dryer opposite, you can provide an access to a confined utility and washing machine room in place of the shower.

This makes it possible to shift the staircase over by this little meter, which then benefits the dressing room upstairs. I wouldn’t miss that little “storage” room in which at most the seventh little goat can hide.

Surely there would be more rejoicing if a fairy “cursed” this planner with more creativity, but with this suggestion I didn’t want to win first prize, but rather to show a minimally invasive way of improvement. Where that is supposed to lead, like to Kitzbühel, I can’t quite follow.

I don’t want to go deeper into it, but radio discipline actually means keeping the channel free for important things, think about that.

And regarding the further explanations: it remains absolute nonsense. No matter how much you twist and turn like an eel. The utility room is also meant to store supplies and possibly also to store bulky valuable things that don’t fit in the attic or shouldn’t be in the garage.

But hey, the main thing is you have one more post again.

For details such as how high the countertop should be, there is no space at all in this draft. Even shifting one or two walls to allow access from the utility room to the bathroom or vice versa is not appropriate in this, let's say, careless and thoughtless draft. As long as the planner is serious about the walk-in closet, I would look for further BUs. Even a layperson should notice the flaws in this floor plan.
Best regards in brief

I don't want to go into this in depth, [...] But hey, the main thing is you have another post.

think about it

I couldn’t have said it better.

but radio discipline actually means keeping the channel free for important matters,

In BOS radio communication it means keeping the radio traffic free of failing utterances that better shouldn’t get into the protocol, in view of radio transcription.

The utility room is also used for storing supplies and

in the specific draft it is rather a HAR with spaces for washing machine and dryer - and anyway no space for any other use.

For details such as how high the countertop should be, there is no space at all yet in this draft.

I have to agree with you - even though the scale and the level of detail pretend an execution plan, this is just a (bad) preliminary draft.

Even this, let’s say, uninspired and thoughtless draft by moving one or two walls so that you can get from the utility room to the bathroom or vice versa, is not appropriate at all here.

I did not want to open a royal road with the suggestion but only show an escape route for saving the spoiled soup. That a confident client would sovereignly throw this mess into the round filing cabinet, I fully agree with you. But if someone is working with drafts from a building contractor’s draftsman, I position myself alternatively for a less strong type of client.

Even a layperson should notice the flaws in this floor plan.

I can well imagine that a layperson would mainly see plus points in this draft:

1) The planner fairly distributed the areas nicely between parents and children;

2) The planner was so kind to at least visualize our owner-construction garage in the outlines in the plans;

3) Also he thought about such small things as window symmetry and our kitchen planning with the countertop-window sill as one piece;

4) There is even a vacuum cleaner parking space in the upper floor.

What a mess the planning really is, the layperson would grasp less by looking at the bare plan but very effectively by following the advice of from post #10 to subject the rooms to a furnishing test.

My children would kill me if I planned a house without a shower on the upper floor and I would have a wet staircase. The walk-in closet is probably a joke, better to have no walk-in closet at all! I find the living room way too small, especially with children. Where are you supposed to put a sofa and a TV and still be able to go out to the terrace door? Does the workroom really have to be that big?

Best regards
Sabine

From the pinned thread with the questionnaire, these questions (see below) are not answered at all. it would be nice if you could explain to us why, for example, no shower is integrated on the upper floor. Since you can gain added value from our critical answers, it would be plausible if you said something about it :) Why did the design turn out the way it is now? For example Standard design from the planner? Which corresponding/wishes were implemented by the architect? A mixture of many examples from various magazines... What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes?