The actual additional costs will not change. Property tax is, for example, also a component of the additional costs in rent.
Why? Household contents have nothing to do with the age of the building, but with the household contents. The building insurance should be lower, as insurers rate new buildings significantly better than old houses – especially when it comes to old half-timbered houses (= high risk due to combustible wood in the walls).
Reserves must be built up. At least from the 10th year onward. Before that, it is not worthwhile, for what reason either.
I assume that the underlying standard value for the property tax in a new building is significantly higher than that of an old building.
Why, from my point of view, the household contents will be more expensive? I assume that in a new owner-occupied house with possibly more space, there will also be more stuff or higher-value items inside, which will accordingly be insured for a higher amount. Example: rental apartment: used kitchen with hardly any residual value, new building house: new kitchen for 15,000 euros. And this difference will be found in further furnishings and accordingly lead to a higher insured sum.
The earlier you start with the reserves, the lower your effective initial amount. Of course, you can also start after ten years, but I personally find that very bold.