Hello builder,
what is not to understand about #6?
I repeat:
That the municipality specifies roof shapes has its reasons, for example to create a uniform settlement appearance. Then "boxing in" the shed roof would probably not be the intention of the author.
Or what you write:
All attempts to convince the building authority and the municipal council have failed.
Or:
Unfortunately, I have already received a rejection from the authority to go below 15 degrees, since the development plan has already been lowered from 35 to 15 degrees and thus sufficient scope for design would exist. The building authority, municipal council and also the building committee have all independently unfortunately made the same decision. I have been trying to get this through for 9 months.
In your case flat roofs are excluded because the appearance of flat roofs is not desired. It may be frustrating for you, but one has to be able to deal with defeats in life - and accept the opinions of others
. Especially when it comes to regulations, the "head-through-the-wall" project does not help
. Especially when the procedure has already been going on for about 9 months. For me, the time would be too precious
There are many builders who get lost in numbers and in this two-story issue - most fixate on a particular house and want it exactly like that... but without compromises, house building doesn’t work either. You also have to open your blinkers a little. There are so many possibilities to still fulfill your little dreams if you are willing to take half a step to the side.
If you are absolutely uncompromising and want to build a flat-roof house by hook or by crook (no matter what the construction looks like inside), then you should have refrained from selling. Now it’s a matter of weighing the flat roof against personal infrastructure... sell or compromise.
As already mentioned, he built the short side with 6m and the long side with 9m.
How do you know? For me, that is just hearsay for now...