Dream of building a house 2025/26 realistic? Currently hardly any equity, but we are fighting!

yes, this is off-topic ... but: In my eyes, self-determination stops where I notice that I am a burden to others. It's the same with climate activists glued to things as it is with parents of noisy children in places where it’s usually quiet. Smokers, hard rockers, motorcyclists. All nice people. (I would like to know how the parents of the toddler would react if the construction company employee lights up a cigar during the appointment. Is that also self-determination, is tolerance also required there?) Yes, we live in a self-determined world, but we also live in a social structure where consideration is increasingly neglected. In all directions. Unfortunately.
The upbringing of my children included consideration, and that also meant being a role model. In places where concentration and quiet are required, small children have no business being there.
I know that I provoke and polarize (right, ;-) ). <\OT>

Hanging a soaked pair of children's pants on the table, subjecting him to children's noise, etc. - is that fair?

If the seller has a problem with that, then he shouldn't complain when his workplace is replaced by a webshop.

If the seller has a problem with it, then he shouldn't complain when his workplace is replaced by a webshop.

Nowadays, do you really have to be grateful as a service provider that your job still exists? Even if it costs your own respect, dignity, and appreciation? I think that in communication both adult parties should make sure to honor the other with the appropriate respect. The hairdresser does that with the yogurt cup full of building blocks (example from ). The parents shouldn't let the playing with it escalate at the seller, after all, they will go home again at some point. Perhaps the better way would have been to wait outside with the pee pants. As far as I know, Kati and her husband agreed on most of the choice of equipment. Because thankfully, that is the direction things are going nowadays: that even the small service provider has the right to dignity (Basic Law). That was not the case for a long time.

Do I understand correctly that (childless) adult people feel their own dignity is hurt when a small child does not manage to get to the toilet in time?

So if it is already being argued that taking a child to an appointment (which is usually not done for fun but because it is necessary) results in a violation of the other party's fundamental rights, then I'm out of here. Something is wrong here.

To the OP: I would also put the desire to have children first. Having children is not an online order that you just place when it suits you. Sometimes it happens unexpectedly, sometimes exactly as planned, sometimes much later, sometimes with miscarriages and the corresponding psychological burden, and sometimes not at all. If you don't want children yet, no problem, but don't postpone it just to save money.

Building a house with children is certainly stressful, but having a house with two children's rooms, two miscarriages, and no child can be even more burdensome.

Can you afford it? I don't really want to judge that, it will definitely be tight.

So before anyone worries about the poor service provider during the sampling, of course we talked to the guy. Like grown-ups do between each other. We didn’t wave the visually inconspicuous garment in his face or anything. Everything is fine.