Design / Improvement Single-family house 150-175m² with hip roof and basement

.. the problem could be the corner at the bottom left of your plan. It must be at least 1 m away from the "neue Grundstücksgrenze".

... double garage and parking space .. how many cars really need to be accommodated? Visitors not counted.

.. the problem might be the bottom left corner in your plan. It must be at least 1 m away from the "new property boundary".

This is just a sketch.

And, the wardrobe fits wonderfully in the discarded version.

Where would you put it then?

.. the problem might be the bottom left corner in your plan. It must be at least 1 m away from the "new property boundary".

1 m from the left side, about 1.8-2 m from the street

... double garage and parking space .. how many cars really need to be accommodated? Visitors not counted.

2 cars, 2 motorcycles, and 6 bicycles. Additionally, I had planned a workbench in the garage since the space where the garage is planned can hardly be used for anything else anyway.

Alternatively, one could consider turning the garage and giving the house a slight L-shape. That would simultaneously have the effect of creating more garden. (green = new, red = old)

Thanks for the input, I need to look into that. I don’t know if this only frees up more space, which I have to keep additional distance from the street anyway.

2 cars, 2 motorcycles and 6 bicycles. additionally, I had also planned a workbench in the garage

What surprises me a bit, it says hip roof. I would have expected a flat roof. A gable roof would also be possible. But a hip roof at this length? Do you already have elevations?

Do you have a bike rental?
I can't find any measurements of the property. So – the idea is just supposed to come across. The cars scattered all over the front yard like that is rather un-German. *ahem*

Has there ever been an attempt to place a rather square floor plan on the west side and the garage on the east side, in order to move the house structure further north?

By the way, I would also consider shortening the discarded design in length - that way it can remain further north and still comply with the setback requirements.

Or as a completely different alternative, if it were legally permissible:
A house whose front follows the northern boundary line, but the roof only "obliquely" follows it.