Debt restructuring in construction financing

  • Erstellt am 2016-03-17 23:08:17

Vanben

2016-03-18 16:36:35
  • #1


I want to contradict that, at least partially! I agree with you that one should not cultivate panic because of the interest rate situation right now and then approach the matter thoughtlessly. But besides that, we have already had the discussion about "price increases in real estate," "rental costs during the saving phase," and "interest rate risk in the future."

I think that in very few cases it is actually necessary to still save equity if you want to buy right now. The only really important point to consider is the over-indebtedness resulting from missing equity in the first 5-8 years. But I see less of a problem here thanks to the "security" provided by the family (parental company). Otherwise, it just gets a bit more expensive, but as long as you can and want to afford it... why not?

If the installments for the loan do not further burden your monthly budget, just pay it off quietly. Apart from a possible interest saving through refinancing, nothing changes for you and your situation.
 

Steffen80

2016-03-18 16:41:54
  • #2


We simply have different opinions :) Why a parental business should serve as security is completely beyond me. I simply assume the OP also has a not very high income, otherwise he probably wouldn't want to refinance 7000 EUR, right? The whole idea is just bad... end of story ;) You can write whatever you want. I have mentioned before... I have two cases of negative equity financing in my circle of acquaintances. Both went belly up.
 

Paddy007

2016-03-18 16:53:16
  • #3
Debt restructuring is simple because I thought that the banks would then be more willing or that we would get a higher loan. This is, please forgive me, my ignorance because I do not come from the field of finance. I think a net income of €2100 + 13th salary (at 75%) is not so bad for Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. My better half knows the downside, she receives minimum wage but is otherwise quite nice;) I see the parental business as a big advantage. Not because I can rest on it and brag, but because it gives a feeling of security. : I thought the same, just to continue servicing it, I just wanted to think about whether it makes sense in terms of interest to write this into subordinate debt (as a layman!)
 

Vanben

2016-03-18 16:57:42
  • #4
(not to be confused with Steffen81 (is someone messing with you there, or has that one been around longer? :D)) I assume that Paddy007, not least as an employee, has enough insight into his parents' business to be able to assess whether it is "doing well" (otherwise he probably wouldn’t be so confident about his job). A healthy company (which he will presumably also (partly) take over later) with a secure job for himself should reduce the risk of personal bankruptcy due to over-indebtedness after a "forced sale" of the house to almost zero. Your opinion is yours to keep, but this is not about the individual "feel-good factor," but more or less hard facts. How Paddy ultimately assesses these facts is his decision and is not really our concern.
 

Vanben

2016-03-18 17:02:00
  • #5
Theoretically, the bank shouldn’t care if another loan is being serviced as long as overall you still have enough to cover the mortgage loan. It doesn’t matter whether the 120 euros are debited together with the installment from the construction loan or separately – it’s not becoming less (aside from interest) just because the amount is on a new piece of paper.

Whether the bank minds in your case that you have a loan running at all, you have to ask the bankers here. But it should basically be irrelevant because you either “disclose” it anyway, and it either bothers them (and you won’t get the construction loan or the refinancing) or it doesn’t. And then you can just let it continue running as is.
 

Steffen80

2016-03-18 17:04:42
  • #6


What comes out of that? Under 3k, right? Kids there? Or planned? That might be okay for Mecklenburg, but it's rather little* income for prospective homeowners. That doesn't generally argue against building a house but strongly for equity. The €7000 here or there... You lack equity and not by a little. Or who pays incidental building costs and so on?

Steffen

*yeah yeah... I know it also depends on the size of the planned house.
 

Similar topics
04.11.2009Taking a loan for equity financing?19
08.07.2013Does the repayment fit the income? - Is financing feasible this way?14
15.11.2013Is financing with this income realistic? Experiences?11
16.01.2014Problems with bank - equity10
17.06.2014House purchase planned at the beginning of 2015 - No equity41
05.10.2014Building a house without equity26
16.02.2015Financing with equity15
07.04.2015Loans and Construction Credit - Creating KfW Usage Evidence11
17.06.2015Building a house without equity or how does one proceed?14
02.02.2016It doesn't work without equity - experience!109
27.06.2018Is financing with low equity sensible?19
14.04.2016Home financing without equity. Is the financing amount too high?25
14.05.2016House purchase: Financing (with/without equity)24
15.05.2016Own home - Planning the property / Financing with income ok?22
25.05.2016Financing without equity - Repayment / Interest63
20.06.2016Experiences with income from self-employed individuals in financing?12
04.07.2016What to do with a lot of equity?17
29.08.2016Can we afford this? Income / Investment / Equity131
04.03.2017New construction - construction loan / additional financing10
06.05.2024Financial planning for new construction with good income and little equity81

Oben