Cost planning

  • Erstellt am 2016-04-29 21:27:47

Sascha aus H

2016-05-11 16:38:07
  • #1

No, those come on top.
 

ypg

2016-05-11 17:14:05
  • #2


I would like to refer you again to #2, so you know what incidental construction costs include. Bauexperte also pointed out the search function.
 

T21150

2016-05-11 18:35:05
  • #3


Yes.

My bank.

Me too.

Back then KFW70 (= today Energy Saving Ordinance 100) to KFW-55: Savings about 10 euros/month.
Capital investment: about 15,000 euros.

Payback: No foreseeable, reasonable timeframes.

Very very very rough rule of thumb:
Each level costs about 10-15k more. Just as a reference.

OK: Our house was built and designed to be already very close to KFW-55. But the hurdle could only be overcome with the above-mentioned investment. So the above 10 euros are relativized to ........ 2 or 3 euros/month?

You don’t build a higher standard to save money. Even KFW70/Energy Saving Ordinance 100 costs almost nothing anymore in terms of heating and hot water, it gets lost in the noise.

You do it with a high standard because you *want* to AND *can* (financially). Wanted: I would have. Could: I couldn’t.

Best regards
Thorsten

PS: The winter wasn’t that cold, but it was long. I heat with gas (also hot water, including thermal solar with about 50% annual coverage), slightly with wood (negligible). Calculated on gas, it was 55/month. The utility company now wanted to lower me to 40/month based on recently read consumption. Let’s say: 55/month is the baseline, this is zero. Here you see what you can still save. 50-70 euros. For that, you have then a 40+ with a thick solar system, certainly also a thermal solar system, insulation to the extreme, and so on. Or a not properly functioning passive house or solar house. Pipe dreams in my opinion. Certainly costs 50k+ compared to Energy Saving Ordinance 100. For the savings, you don’t get the necessary funds financed for the next level from 100 -->55.........
 

Bamue89

2016-05-11 19:18:48
  • #4
Hash: search function //
 

Becker84

2016-05-13 19:44:48
  • #5
Yesterday I was at the civil engineer whom I will probably be building with. According to him, I would be at 1300-1400 € / m² or 300 € / m³ in standard construction, i.e. Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 with gas.

Question 1: How much does a geothermal heat pump with 2 deep drillings more cost me? Does the heat pump cost about the same as a gas boiler and I only pay the drilling(s) as an extra charge??

KfW55 +15,000€ he said is about right. Here I would still get 5,000€ gifted by the KfW bank and the cheaper loan, which according to my calculation is another 5,800€. So effective additional costs of only 4,200€ + costs from question 1.

KfW40+ would be an additional 30,000€ more and "only" 10,000€ gifted by the KfW bank = 20,000€ more. For that I would rather build the double garage.

Or is 15,000€ set too high for a photovoltaic system with storage?

Maybe it also makes sense to do KfW55 with photovoltaic system + storage. Then I would be at 0.0 gas and hopefully 0.0 electricity costs.
 

jaeger

2016-05-14 07:44:07
  • #6


Hard to say, as the figures vary greatly depending on the region and soil conditions and of course how deep you have to go. You should also first clarify whether this is even possible or allowed in your area. Here, a meter costs about 70 euros, but at least 180 meters would have to be drilled. So relatively expensive, which is why I tend to prefer a trench collector.
 

Similar topics
10.05.2012Heating costs per year KfW55 - KfW70, building decision heating11
03.07.2013GAS / SOLAR or GAS / Ventilation + Heat Recovery20
14.10.2014KfW70 with gas condensing boiler and solar is definitely not possible21
29.01.2015Meaningful energy concept for new Kfw70 construction without oil or gas19
18.04.2015House construction, KFW70, approx. 150m², which heating? Gas/air-water heat pump?36
30.04.2015KFW70 with gas-solar heating65
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
08.10.2015KfW70 only with heat pump now?26
10.01.2017Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 / KFW55 / Gas + Solar in 201628
16.12.2015Is KfW55 worth it instead of KfW70 with an additional cost?16
02.02.2017Construction costs kfw70 vs. kfw55 vs. kfw4030
24.04.2016KFW70 with gas condensing boiler + solar hot water + chimney10
03.04.2018New building KfW55 with gas, solar, and controlled residential ventilation with heat recovery43
15.03.2018KfW 55 or just the Energy Saving Ordinance - gas and preferably no ventilation?23
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
13.12.2019Gas with solar thermal or heat pump? And possibly photovoltaics?13
20.01.2020Build a multi-family house according to the Energy Saving Ordinance or KFW55?29
05.12.2020Gas with solar thermal? Or heat pump with photovoltaics? Consultation149
25.07.2020New single-family house with liquefied petroleum gas - also possible without photovoltaics or solar?24
17.10.2023Evaluation of photovoltaic system offer with storage78

Oben