Oops.....sorry, I hope that didn’t come across wrong.
I have only partly experienced how people get worked up over such terms and, unfortunately, subordinate their own needs to them.
Maybe you could start the conversations right away with your floor plan and not first choose a model and then "bend" it.
Yes, people here are familiar with that... unfortunately often, because it prescribes a more or less fixed form which frequently leads to problems in the interior design.
You’ll see how far the company will accommodate your floor plan.
No, all good.
Yes, we’ll have to see if they are flexible enough that you don’t have to completely follow one of the models, but rather focus on the floor plan.
Why I call the "city villas" replacement villas, I think we don’t need to rehash here.
What is the planning goal anyway? — to make only 69 sqm upstairs here, like 74 sqm downstairs, I don’t see that as necessary anywhere. I then see the wall between child/sleeping or child/bathroom would have to be load-bearing. Which variant (thermal / porous brick / sand-lime brick) do you want to build?
Price-wise it will be quite a bit more than just 148:143. It could end up around the "Florenz" model (154 sqm), technically "Modena" is closer.
The planning goal is simply to have a house with 2 full floors but exactly this floor plan. We are not fans of sloped roofs and gable roofs. It’s clear that city villas are just replacement villas; we don’t care about pomp, but simply about the house style and shape. The slightly Mediterranean style is just our thing.
Honestly, we haven’t thought about the variant yet. We are quite inexperienced there and will get advice next week.
The Florenz model is out of the question both price-wise and in terms of the floor plan.
What do you mean by technically with Modena?