Consultation for photovoltaic system

  • Erstellt am 2021-09-13 14:52:07

hampshire

2021-09-16 23:06:00
  • #1
The phrase "save CO2" is odd. What exactly do you "save" there? Using less is already enough. I can sugarcoat it as a forest owner – however, the forest would also store CO2 as long as it is left standing, even if it is not in my possession. I can tell myself that refraining from intensive management is a contribution. I sometimes do that too. ;) I am still looking for about 10 hectares of contiguous deciduous forest in the Bergisches Land to leave standing and remove from management. Maybe someone has a tip for me.
 

Deliverer

2021-09-17 07:37:24
  • #2
Every generated kWh ensures that it does not have to be produced from fossil fuels. The average kWh in Germany has a CO2 footprint of 440g. This will ease with the increasing expansion of renewables - but currently I reduce Germany's CO2 footprint by about 2 gas heaters. And anyone with a roof can do that! And you even get paid for it!! How crazy is that?!?! :-)
 

KingJulien

2021-09-17 07:49:23
  • #3
That is a bit too general for me. Under certain circumstances, certainly. With a turnkey, normal-sized system that is planned now and then only gets a feed-in tariff of max. 7,xx cents, probably not.
 

Deliverer

2021-09-17 08:30:48
  • #4
If I had written, "a photovoltaic system pays off in 8-18 years," would that have been better? ;-)

So: of course, as with all purchases, you need to do a bit of research beforehand to avoid the usual pitfalls. I’ll address your terms directly:

Turnkey: That’s what I meant. If you build it yourself, the system pays off in 2/3 of the time.

Normally sized: Normally sized is a system when all roof surfaces (house, garage, carport) are fully utilized, unless it faces FULL north AND is steeper than 25°. Normally sized is not what the solar installer recommends. He’s lazy and prefers to spend less time on the roof, so he can serve more customers with storage batteries... And yes – if you can only fit 5 kWp on a mid-terrace house, then the payback shifts backward, up to "unprofitability." These roofs will just have to wait until the next roof renovation...

Feed-in tariff: Once you have received your offer, you can calculate whether it is good. Determine the yield (yourself), multiply it by the feed-in tariff, times 20. If the offer is below that, good. If not, bad. The rest depends on self-consumption.

If you do it this way, 11-12 years is a good average. After that, you make money for 8 years and then have 18 years of cheap self-generated electricity.

You can optimize further by removing solar thermal systems and chimneys. Heat pumps will have to be installed in a few years anyway; currently, they are heavily subsidized. Moreover, heat pumps increase self-consumption and push the payback period further forward.

Two more notes:
- A storage battery does not pay off. Therefore, exclude it from calculations (and preferably also from the order).
- "No roof" is an excuse, "no money" is not. The KFW offers loans at 1%. Most banks are even cheaper since the installments are legally guaranteed to be paid by the energy supplier. So it is a very low-risk loan that everyone should get after talking to their banker.
 

Tom1978

2021-09-17 08:40:07
  • #5
We are getting a 13.29 kWp photovoltaic system. Now the question is whether a storage system is worth it without subsidies. I searched for storage systems on the internet myself and came across this one. The price already looks great. The question always is: a) Does the photovoltaic installer also install it? b) How good is it actually? Luckily, it will still take about 10 months until completion with us. I hope that by then the new storage subsidy will come in Brandenburg.
 

Deliverer

2021-09-17 08:49:57
  • #6
If you come under €250 per kWh, have three times more photovoltaics than storage, and you can more or less always empty the storage at night, it should pay off.

A small addition to my sermon above: Please also be very, very critical of cloud tariffs and google them beforehand. Most tariffs are already bad from the start. The main problem, however, is that people base their 20-year calculation on them. Currently, one of the biggest providers is canceling all its "good" contracts and thereby destroying the calculations of thousands of customers who were previously talked into an outrageously expensive huge storage as a cloud condition...
 

Similar topics
23.02.2015Air-water heat pump with solar thermal and fireplace? Cost/benefit/meaning34
10.07.2016Air-water heat pump with photovoltaics or pellet with solar25
13.07.2016Photovoltaic storage - experiences? Tips?17
10.10.2017New photovoltaic system with storage in single-family home - experiences39
20.10.2017Roof with photovoltaic or other investment, any experiences?19
05.03.2018Photovoltaic planning - possible retrofitting of battery storage13
07.05.2020Collaboration of air-water heat pump, photovoltaic system, and storage38
10.11.2021Photovoltaic system: Costs, saving potential? - Experiences?240
05.05.2020Photovoltaic system + storage with or without cloud tariff13
08.05.2020Heat pump + photovoltaic system with or without storage11
28.03.2021Strom-Cloud experiences vs. feed-in tariff?94
18.12.2020Install photovoltaic power storage yes or no?53
06.10.2021Photovoltaic system / heat pump, do you have 2 meters?55
17.08.2021Calculation of a photovoltaic system regarding economic efficiency11
27.10.2021Photovoltaic system 120 sqm living area - cover the entire roof?45
25.03.2022Switching from gas to solar / photovoltaic with / without heat pump31
17.10.2023Evaluation of Photovoltaic System Offer with Storage78
22.03.2024Should photovoltaic design be considered with the heat pump or not?20
27.09.2024Offer for photovoltaic system including storage - Storage yes/no?44
06.01.2025Is the photovoltaic price okay? 10.2 kWp and 5 kWh storage14

Oben