Construction supervision by an expert?

  • Erstellt am 2012-08-18 13:37:15

€uro

2012-08-23 15:34:47
  • #1
Please read carefully! =>" in diesem Bereich"! By the way, one can certainly have different opinions, which is quite legitimate.
This is not an invented decision, but simply an adjustment to the requirements and new conditions.
An entrepreneurial decision that everyone must make for themselves anew each time. Predefined "protection areas" are out of place here.
Expansion, in my opinion, has never led to lasting success, at best temporarily. If my capacity is exceeded, I decline orders. Quite simply, I do not have to expand for that reason.
This means that the majority of the construction projects are handled via supraregional general contractors / construction managers.
That annoys me too, admittedly, but what does that change? That good quality inevitably causes costs is undisputed, but who actually cares? The main thing is the "dream house" at a bargain price.
Later the whining is often loud, if at all publicly noticeable. These clients are lost to reputable providers in the long run.
There are plenty and enough naive, inexperienced people. The market accordingly serves this demand.

Regards
 

Stefanoi

2012-08-23 17:10:50
  • #2


If everything is itemized like this, you can also understand what the architects have done or where tasks are still pending that they need to handle.

In my case, I don’t have a signed contract with the architect either.

We never even saw things like 3D (as promised to us at the start).

We had to listen to accusations that we are resistant to advice --> just because we prefer a roof overhang to a roof that cuts off at the house wall.

Yes, and the sum of all this is that I am frustrated and try to do most of it myself / which is difficult for me since I am always on the move (writing this from Mexico right now)

But thanks for the numerous replies, very helpful
 

Häuslebauer40

2012-08-24 07:58:02
  • #3


Yes, yes... it all reads wonderfully. Paper is patient, including the HOAI...
 

Bauexperte

2012-08-24 10:22:15
  • #4
Hello,


That is unfortunate, as you now realize, because it will be difficult to determine the scope of the commission. Because even without a signed contract, you have entered into a legally binding agreement with your architect, precisely at the moment you asked him to draw plans for you.


Again – after your return, seek a conversation with your architect and don’t get further worked up over “unlaid” eggs for the time being; it also really takes a toll on your stomach. You haven’t even started actual construction yet; in the end, you might end up with a stomach ulcer in your new house :-(

Only if the conversation does not lead to the hoped-for/desirable outcome should you consider partially terminating the verbally concluded contract.

Kind regards
 

€uro

2012-08-27 08:37:03
  • #5
Hello construction expert, In my opinion, this is a big mistake found in many internet forums. The opinion expressed by the questioner should always be questioned before it is taken into consideration. This applies especially to anonymous messages. On the contrary, a major focus of my work. On the topic: A good horse only jumps as high as it must – or, you don’t have to unnecessarily inflate a balloon without a substantial increase in value for the client. E.Curb is certainly right; in the details there is more effort involved than laypeople would suspect based on the hours seen. However, one can concentrate on critical focal points. But Häuslebauer is not entirely wrong either. Paper is indeed sometimes patient. To see this, one only has to look at the many nicely calculated Energy Saving Ordinance/KfW certificates compared with practical implementation. This applies to many forums. The somewhat naive optimists really expect valuable things for free or believe that generous gifts are distributed (subsidies). That is also my position. The percentage of the wiser will increase. Agreement, also my argumentation. Rather a few m³ less enclosed space, maybe somewhat more modest, but solid and exact foundations and quality that always pay off in the long run. Best regards
 

Osnabruecker

2023-07-03 13:04:16
  • #6
14,000 euros maybe 11 years ago... that's how old the post is.
 

Similar topics
23.10.2008We need an architect - or should I do it myself?14
02.01.2009Experiences with architects15
19.03.2013Turnkey or build with architects?19
21.07.2013Cost estimates from two architects differ greatly!10
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
30.01.2014Architect's cost estimation15
21.08.2014Construction costs when building with architects. What does your experience say?18
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
19.12.2014Finding architects - but how?26
08.09.2015Massive house by the architect, approximate costs?16
23.09.2015Responsibilities of the Architect in Tendering18
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
20.08.2016Should the house be planned by a general contractor or architects?30
10.03.2017Payment of the architect16
12.10.2017Cost of enclosed space. First draft discussed with architects27
16.02.2018Stress with the architect - naively signed the preliminary contract17
28.02.2019HOAI or why architects have no interest.....38
11.03.2020Architects invoice - Amount okay?13

Oben