The estimates apply only to the building, not the land, which is extra.
Hufhaus 500-600,000, substructure on the slope + incidental construction costs... 865,000? 900,000???
That was also correct.
The architect gave 700,000€ for land + acquisition incidental costs, house + incidental construction costs, double garage, architect’s fee, photovoltaics and kitchen. As written, according to the architect, we could put in the furniture for 700,000€. I never said anything about 900,000€.
And my post (see first quote) still stands!
No idea what possessed the architect to give such a price forecast... I’m also not exactly the kind of person who can estimate house costs off the cuff like .
But I see the slope, which requires immense earthworks, underpinning, access roads and drainage (no idea if the terms are spot on here), and I see a house like Davinci or Huf, whose price range starts at 500,000. (just googled from 350,000? in small?)
plus a two-story basement... a dream plot looks different, maybe it is the location that is presented here as optimal, plus adequate fittings (pleated blinds, no cheap kitchen, immense number of spotlights, ...)
I’m assuming a cautious calculation by an architect who likes to take on a challenge – even if it means telling the builder that he’s miscalculated by almost 100,000.
Posts like in #61 I find somewhat sad: there calculations are made and planned scenarios are used instead of establishing a healthy actual calculation.