ypg
2024-03-15 19:22:58
- #1
I am bidding: 1650€/sqm despite the freaking expensive ventilation system and roof design… plus almost exactly 20,000€ ancillary building costs. And you can see: one calculates without, the other with earthworks/ancillary building costs.
Comparison is pointless. Even the ancillary building costs can triple if you have bad soil conditions. If someone then adds that to the house costs, it is practically a total falsification.
It is also just one factor that you even get a ballpark figure. 3000€/sqm (house construction 2022, 2023, currently 2024) reflects the living space of a simple standard house: plastered, Renewable Energy Act minimum requirements, no exclusive frills, no exotic building materials.
I have the feeling that I/we already wrote this to you….
It says:
… that’s what makes building a house expensive: the extras.
Comparison is pointless. Even the ancillary building costs can triple if you have bad soil conditions. If someone then adds that to the house costs, it is practically a total falsification.
At a "cheap" 3000€ per square meter, that's already a difference of many thousands, depending on what you calculate with
It is also just one factor that you even get a ballpark figure. 3000€/sqm (house construction 2022, 2023, currently 2024) reflects the living space of a simple standard house: plastered, Renewable Energy Act minimum requirements, no exclusive frills, no exotic building materials.
I have the feeling that I/we already wrote this to you….
It says:
3000€/sqm is a guideline for a standard house, square, practical, good, plastered. Standard bathroom, no high-end luxury bathroom. Plastic front door, no wood, no aluminum.
It is cheaper to build in the north, more expensive in the south. If you want to use higher-quality materials or improve the KfW standard with photovoltaic, something like that comes on top.
… that’s what makes building a house expensive: the extras.