Fuchur
2018-09-11 20:07:10
- #1
Hello everyone,
I need to vent our frustration here.
Situation: House planned with an architect with a construction price limit including additional construction costs of 400k.
Interim status: Plan completion type "city villa", 173m², 2 full floors, clinker brick, basement, double garage with entrance canopy. Asked the architect whether the set budget is sufficient, which was confirmed - building application submitted.
We were aware that the budget would probably be tight, but reserves are available.
While the building application is now in process, we obtained offers. Twice as individual contracts initially for the shell construction and once as a complete contract. Offer 1: Shell construction basement, house walls outside and inside, roof including roof tiles, shell construction garage - including clinker brick and interior plaster ground floor/upper floor, without windows and doors, without garage door
Price: 365k
Offer 2: Services as above.
Price: 355k
Offer 3: Complete house and garage with simple standard finishing and standard technology according to main contractor construction specification.
Price: 580-600k
If I estimate the missing trades, all 3 offers probably end up in comparable ranges. And that does not include surcharges for higher-quality materials or better heating technology nor development costs and other additional construction costs or change orders. Additionally, there are already the paid architect costs for service phases 1-4.
We are not even talking about the Munich villa district here, but exaggeratedly about the Saxon province.
Is this completely insane or do we just have wrong expectations?
There are many tips on what criteria to choose your construction company by. By now we would actually be glad if we could find one at all that builds the house at reasonable prices.
By now we are already considering withdrawing the building application and just taking a catalog house. There are not that many surcharges you can sink into such a house to reach such sums.
I need to vent our frustration here.
Situation: House planned with an architect with a construction price limit including additional construction costs of 400k.
Interim status: Plan completion type "city villa", 173m², 2 full floors, clinker brick, basement, double garage with entrance canopy. Asked the architect whether the set budget is sufficient, which was confirmed - building application submitted.
We were aware that the budget would probably be tight, but reserves are available.
While the building application is now in process, we obtained offers. Twice as individual contracts initially for the shell construction and once as a complete contract. Offer 1: Shell construction basement, house walls outside and inside, roof including roof tiles, shell construction garage - including clinker brick and interior plaster ground floor/upper floor, without windows and doors, without garage door
Price: 365k
Offer 2: Services as above.
Price: 355k
Offer 3: Complete house and garage with simple standard finishing and standard technology according to main contractor construction specification.
Price: 580-600k
If I estimate the missing trades, all 3 offers probably end up in comparable ranges. And that does not include surcharges for higher-quality materials or better heating technology nor development costs and other additional construction costs or change orders. Additionally, there are already the paid architect costs for service phases 1-4.
We are not even talking about the Munich villa district here, but exaggeratedly about the Saxon province.
Is this completely insane or do we just have wrong expectations?
There are many tips on what criteria to choose your construction company by. By now we would actually be glad if we could find one at all that builds the house at reasonable prices.
By now we are already considering withdrawing the building application and just taking a catalog house. There are not that many surcharges you can sink into such a house to reach such sums.