11ant
2019-05-29 00:21:05
- #1
And what did he do for that, if checking compliance with your wishes was not included?The complete contract has already been reviewed by a lawyer - didn’t want to pay 220 €/net per hour again.
Forget it. If you otherwise ended up with nothing because the funding measure would then expire, that might still be acceptable. But to expect damages from him because you "earned too much" in the next assessment year would probably be going too far. And a guarantee hardly makes sense without a penalty clause. So: tick it off. Plan worst case, i.e. the house smaller by the funding amount (or the bank financing correspondingly higher) - that seems to me unfortunately the most sensible advice.However, we want to phrase the paragraph so that readiness for occupancy must be in 2020 in any case, since otherwise we would not get child construction allowance.