Community of accrued gains in construction

  • Erstellt am 2018-04-20 07:50:25

Yaso2.0

2019-01-17 14:06:03
  • #1


I was in the situation where I had nothing after the separation. (and by nothing, I mean nothing except my clothes!)

It made me stronger ..
 

apokolok

2019-01-17 14:44:55
  • #2

Sounds good in theory.
In practice, I know some people well who do exactly that.
The result is that both basically work full-time, the child is in daycare from early morning until evening, and both have no energy for the child in the evenings and on weekends because the job is so stressful.

Of course, it doesn’t have to be that way; it depends on the employer and the type of person, but the risk is definitely there.

Alternative: one stays at home completely at first and then starts again at 50% or so later.
 

Wiesel29

2019-01-17 15:05:48
  • #3
If we were in the private sector, I would agree with you here, but we are both civil servants (don't worry, we really work and don't just cost money). The child would be at the daycare until 1:30 pm, and the parent who starts later would still be home by 4 pm at the latest. You only have stress if you make it for yourself. So keep your eyes open when choosing a career.
 

apokolok

2019-01-17 16:13:46
  • #4
That is indeed a different constellation, there is a lot to your last sentence.
It's a solid thing if both of you agree with it.
 

Buchweizen

2019-01-17 16:25:12
  • #5


Of course they can. And how! Only if your acquaintance was so, hmm, let’s call it “generous,” to pay for EVERYTHING, he can hardly complain afterwards, at least regarding the quoted things. She probably didn’t force him to pamper her that much.

I completely agree with , we handle it exactly the way he and his girlfriend do, and our marriage contract contains the nice global waiver, so that in the event of a divorce, both of us come out of the marriage without damage.



I don’t believe that; you just have to look at some well-known personalities—or even just listen to friends or acquaintances. And honestly: if I end up with nothing, knowing that I was really screwed over, the thought that the person might also experience something bad in 35 years doesn’t really console me.
 

Yaso2.0

2019-01-17 17:28:44
  • #6


The child was conceived together and he also has to take responsibility for the fact that she needs financial support if she earns correspondingly less than before. Personally, I don’t find it bad or wrong at all that he paid it. It’s her "unfair" way that gets on one’s nerves, after he has also done so much for her in addition.



It’s not even about something bad happening to the other person, it can also be that something a thousand times better happens to oneself. Just like in my case!
 
Oben