Cell tower next to construction site

@WingVII: Now let's get to the point. Explain to all of us and the OP your findings and where you got them from. So far, you just throw in a "WHO!" or something similar and try to spread fear by omitting relevant information (keyword Brazilian study).

I have no evidence for it. It remains that it is unexplained and probably harmless. But with a lower probability also dangerous. However, simply classifying the pure discussion as esoteric, contrarian thinking, or something else is just limited and shows pure ignorance. I don’t want to convince anyone here, but in my case, I only want to minimize risk. That means that for me, living in the main beam/wave (and that is a technical definition and not an esoteric one), without at least sound technical measures, would not have been an option. But now I live there anyway and don’t think about the mast for a second. Furthermore, I am also interested in the whole topic technically/physically, which is why I wanted to briefly outline at the beginning what is possible.

Something like this is actually completely counterproductive. Nice that no radiation comes from the router and the transmitter mast anymore, but your phone glows when trying to send something there, so the radiation exposure increases significantly.. Unless you don’t use any devices in the house, but that doesn’t seem to be the case.

No, it is not. Your assumption is completely wrong. You can still make calls perfectly well even below the target value of 1 microwatt/sqm. 0.1 is enough for that. And since I have IT cables everywhere, nothing else has bothered me so far.

Proving a negative is simply much more difficult. Following the motto: Prove to me that God does not exist. That is the end of any factual discussion.

No, it is not. Your assumption is completely wrong. You can still easily make phone calls even below the target value of 1 microwatt/sqm. 0.1 is also sufficient for that. And since I have IT cables everywhere, nothing else has bothered me so far.

Reading?
Of course you can still make calls like that, but the mobile phone transmits many times stronger, which leads to the opposite effect.
I also don't understand what IT cables have to do with mobile reception.

Reading?
Of course, you can still make calls this way, but the mobile phone transmits many times stronger, which leads to the opposite effect.
I also don't understand what EDV lines have to do with mobile reception.

No, it does not transmit stronger!! Despite the 45 decibel attenuation, I still have 75-90% signal. Because it attenuates relative to 200 microwatts/sqm down to close to 0 (i.e., between 1 and 0.1 microwatts/sqm) but not completely. Much lower power levels are sufficient to make calls without a mobile burnout.

The EDV lines referred to WLAN ;-). And I have almost everywhere WLAN reception, only in the bedroom it becomes tight. But I don't need it there anyway.

I have no evidence for that. It remains that it is unresolved and probably harmless.

No, it remains that as of today there are no negative findings. There is no evidence of dangers – only assumptions/rumors/YouTube etc.