Tassimat
2021-01-16 18:35:08
- #1
First, do without DECT, WLAN, and smartphones yourself. Those who can't manage that shouldn't think about the masts. Everything else is preaching water and drinking wine.
Devices cannot be compared to a stationary mast. On the one hand, the exposure is temporary, and on the other hand, the power decreases significantly with every meter. A mast transmits 24/7.First, give up DECT, WLAN, and smartphones yourself. If you can't manage that, you don't need to think about the masts. Everything else is like drinking wine and preaching water.
So what now? Almost or myth? I actually just wanted to say that it is at least controversial. After all, there are established legal limit values for electrosmog that are supposed to protect against health damage. But yes, according to the defined limit values, you could probably set up a mast every 100 meters.... and which experts almost classify as belonging to the realm of alternative facts
Don’t worry, I’m not going to do that. But it remains at least a controversially discussed topic.Please don’t get worked up about that. Otherwise, you would have to tell 80-90% of Germans that they are irradiated (in the city, it would be 100% of the inhabitants with 500m).
The mentioned devices/installations cannot be compared with the transmission behavior of a stationary mast.Consistent renunciation, if one is so afraid of radiation, of mobile phones, WLAN, high-voltage power lines, trains (because of high voltage) is the consequence for such people.
No, that is correct. The emitted radiation is indeed higher!!!The mentioned devices/systems cannot be compared to the transmission behavior of a stationary mast.