Buying a shell construction - Experiences

  • Erstellt am 2016-04-25 09:32:21

HilfeHilfe

2016-05-06 14:57:00
  • #1


is just a gut feeling
 

T21150

2016-05-06 18:39:42
  • #2


As I also said: I see it exactly the same way.

That is not a KO criterion.
 

T21150

2016-05-06 18:46:38
  • #3


The standstill is described in the initial thread. About 2 years.

I would advise the OP not to blindly push the price down further. The OP plans: Bring in an expert.

After that, you can see where it still sticks.
Of course something is stuck after 2 years of standstill. You quantify that and then continue negotiating. If no disaster happened during construction, not much will be broken – then the price is also reasonably okay.

You have to see: The house is not tiny. The OPs plan 150K for further expansion + 145K purchase = 295,000. Corresponds to about 1800 euros/sqm. That’s acceptable.

I think they still have some potential to go down, whether 150K is really necessary depends on the OP’s requirements and the necessities to comply with the energy saving ordinance based on the completed shell (but the expert can quantify that well).

Best regards
Thorsten
 

Payday

2016-05-07 12:58:46
  • #4
no, nothing about that is okay. The house is already 2 years old with very likely worse insulation. You have to take the house as it is, and some things may no longer be installable (or only with difficulty) (e.g., ventilation system, if the heights no longer allow it, or electric shutters (except for that nonsense of external pre-assembly)). You don’t know the history of the house, something will definitely be wrong. And as someone else already wrote: the demand for such buildings is very low. There’s a reason for that. If you are going to do something like this, it also has to be worth it! 1800€/sqm is definitely not “worth it”. You might as well build and plan completely new. For me, I would only do something like this if you can really save around 50,000€ or so in the end. Here, it also comes into play that the land is only leasehold. Leasehold may be fine for some, but for me from the countryside, that is nonsense (supply/demand for land). If you are really interested, you absolutely have to go with an expert. If there are still doubts, a friend knowledgeable about shell construction is enough at first. Unfortunately, experts are not clairvoyant either and many potential defects are already hidden.
 

Similar topics
04.11.2012Expert despite TÜV approval?13
01.10.2013Construction company would rather not have an assessor11
23.12.2020Heritable lease property the only solution?53
14.12.2015Expert discovers defects in the basement. What to do?11
30.06.2016Existing property - appraiser, financing, negotiating...17
25.04.2018Heritable lease and bridge financing11
01.08.2018Construction company demands extra costs due to cooperation with appraiser21
15.05.2020General Questions (Heritable Building Rights)43
20.10.2020Heritable lease with equity capital - claim by the heritable lessee20
01.11.2020Rough cost estimate house renovation built in '73 - appraiser17
03.03.2021Single-family house + land (purchase or leasehold) with high interest rates26
20.10.2021Renovation of a 1960s house: Questionable expert recommendations?92
06.09.2021Ground lease building plot experiences?40
17.03.2022DSL Bank takes a long time processing, now also sending surveyors for 200k22
07.05.2023Is it sensible for the expert to inspect the base plate?55

Oben