Thanks for the answers :)
We spoke again with our bank advisor last night, and without us knowing, he sent someone there to look at the house because he knows both prices. So once the price she paid back then and the one we are paying now. It seemed strange to him and he just wanted to make sure that the bank doesn’t lose out in the worst case. The inspector who was there estimated the house at 330k and found nothing to criticize.
The house costs 280k, which sounds like a lot in my opinion, but when you know what the houses around there are supposed to cost, and some of them are in a condition... they were mostly built between 1950 and 1970 and nothing has happened since then.
We had looked at another house before, which should have cost 225k, but we would have had to do all sorts of things there...
The things we will take over are also listed, the notary and the bank advisor have already mentioned that.
I see it the same way... she wouldn’t sell us any "junk" if she’s staying in the neighborhood, just a house away. I think it’s more that it’s such a big investment, it’s normal to have concerns about it.
The reason why they are only now buying the bigger house is easy to explain. The said house has always pleased her, but it was occupied. She wants to become self-employed soon, which wasn’t an issue before. The couple who currently live there, or rather own it, have separated and the house is being sold, well over 400k plus renovation. So one thing led to another :)
At least I’m reassured now and looking forward to the house :D
PS: Why Schauerland? o_O;)