Nobody is talking about a legal dispute. It's about finding an amicable agreement. We are talking about costs just under 20k. That is nothing that endangers the construction project, but still an unplanned, unfunded expense that we would have preferred to have absorbed elsewhere in the house.
In September 2022, I received an email that said: "The structural engineer commented on the foundation under the middle wall, with the conclusion that the extremely eccentric strip foundation leads to an impermissible edge pressure, which exceeds the allowable soil pressure by 190%."
My point was that it would be cheaper to rebuild the wall rather than underpin the foundation.
This proposal was rejected with the reasoning that even with a concentric wall, the foundation is not properly dimensioned.
Again, my concern: I do not want a legal dispute, but a fair solution, e.g. 50:50.
Do I have more than "motalische" arguments on my side here, or are you generally of the opinion that I am out of luck?
What do you mean by "the contractor has to [...] increase order volume."?
I find all of this very unprofessional or deliberately non-transparent communication. We were always led to understand that we could carry out the construction project this way; otherwise, we would not have signed...