I repeat myself when I say that the years-long migration from the construction industry to the industrial sector has led to hardly anyone having learned the craft they practice from the ground up, and you can see that now.
That was also the main reason for my resignation from the window industry (starting almost ten years ago), that getting qualified installers was harder than getting an appointment with a specialist doctor.
That is very true. My husband is a trained landscape gardener and cannot leave construction sites for a day because all the assistants without instruction and supervision do not know what they are doing. Basically, the teams in his company at best consist of 2 trained professionals, the rest are career changers or helpers without vocational training.
Yes, the times with a 50% certification rate (every two-person team one journeyman and one helper) are over. By now, even entire crews led by at least a multi-year experienced semi-trained worker are a rarity.
I have gathered 10 architects in my circle of friends and work, but even those who had also built themselves had sometimes massive problems during or after the construction, up to court proceedings and now third expert opinions.
Knowing architects or being one yourself alone is unfortunately not enough.
I regret not having built myself…
We build with a general contractor (GU).
A major problem for many clients is their completely unrealistic idea of what a general contractor (GU) actually is (and by what means he tries more or less successfully to fulfill his fixed-price performance promise). But how someone with ten architects in their circle of friends cannot be an exception to this phenomenon, you will have to explain to me in more detail sometime.
Nowadays, in my opinion, it is pure luck how things go when you have something built. And it does not matter whether GU, construction management (BT) or individual contracts.
As someone who earns his living significantly with this "casting call", I have to strongly disagree. The construction management (BT) is naturally out when it is your own property, but still rightly included by you in this list (because the phenomenon does not fundamentally bypass BT customers). In this respect, GU and BT essentially only differ in who contributes the land to the building project—the quality of their employees is basically the same. However, there is a huge quality difference between a) GUs who participate in tenders and b) GUs whom naive clients approach without tendering. I repeat this for good reason until the last potential victim understands it.
You do not stand on the construction site for 8 hours with the people and instruct them in any of the mentioned situations.
Leadership is an important topic. And also that you must not confuse construction managers with "construction managers" I say like a mantra. For my clients, construction quality assurance does not start with inspection, because before inspection comes prophylaxis and prevention. This means first, strict moderation with obsession for individual planning and detail gimmicks for the clients. Furthermore, detail planning includes not only the drafting part with the representation of execution and connections but also the focus on inspection. Inspection means, importantly, not catching someone doing something wrong!
An underrated, essential lever is to take at least a catalog model with series experience preferably in the shell construction phase. Step two is then not to overload the house with details.