11ant
2023-09-05 12:32:06
- #1
I'll start with the question from your headline: by joining the two units side by side, you save two side building gaps, thus potentially "gaining" six meters of usable plot width in exchange for one window side per unit. What you directly save in connection with this sticking together of the two units in terms of money, we're talking about eighty-five pfennigs, if at all. Almost "more spiritual, you know," to quote Monaco Franze ;-)
Being able to and being allowed to are at least two different things, so you should definitely look at the development plan. We are also happy to help you interpret it – caution! you are not allowed to link it here (but you can name it, e.g. "Hintertupfing No. 258 am Rübenacker"). You are talking about one plot for two single-family houses – they must not only have space there but also be allowed there.
You have hopefully already read that "prefabricated" houses are neither more finished nor more budget-secure (but also not less solid than stone-on-stone built ones). The commonality of most pub myths is their often scant truth content. However, I do like the approach that you want to make "as few changes as possible," because that is the best way to succeed with a standard house design.
Regarding your question number 0, which you only added here afterwards...
...you will find in numerous threads here under the keywords for forum search "With basement"/"Without basement" and "Goalkeeper thread" explained warnings why in the case of a semi-detached house secondly the planning should be done jointly and firstly the straight arrow path to disaster would be if the one without basement builds before the one with basement. By the way, in case the decision goes towards the semi-detached house, I recommend my (external) contribution "A semi-detached house has TWO halves," see "building now." The difference between the two units is unproblematic except for the basement aspect (see the keyword "11ant basement rule," which the plot also has a say in), but the profile at the "seam" of the two halves is also critical.
Being able to and being allowed to are at least two different things, so you should definitely look at the development plan. We are also happy to help you interpret it – caution! you are not allowed to link it here (but you can name it, e.g. "Hintertupfing No. 258 am Rübenacker"). You are talking about one plot for two single-family houses – they must not only have space there but also be allowed there.
You have hopefully already read that "prefabricated" houses are neither more finished nor more budget-secure (but also not less solid than stone-on-stone built ones). The commonality of most pub myths is their often scant truth content. However, I do like the approach that you want to make "as few changes as possible," because that is the best way to succeed with a standard house design.
Regarding your question number 0, which you only added here afterwards...
If it should be 2 single-family houses, does it make sense to build them at the same time? Or is it maybe even better to build one after the other to learn from potential mistakes...
...you will find in numerous threads here under the keywords for forum search "With basement"/"Without basement" and "Goalkeeper thread" explained warnings why in the case of a semi-detached house secondly the planning should be done jointly and firstly the straight arrow path to disaster would be if the one without basement builds before the one with basement. By the way, in case the decision goes towards the semi-detached house, I recommend my (external) contribution "A semi-detached house has TWO halves," see "building now." The difference between the two units is unproblematic except for the basement aspect (see the keyword "11ant basement rule," which the plot also has a say in), but the profile at the "seam" of the two halves is also critical.