Will the Energy Saving Ordinance from 2021 make new construction unaffordable?

  • Erstellt am 2019-01-11 12:32:13

apokolok

2019-01-11 16:37:14
  • #1
Well, it wasn't meant completely seriously. Specifically, you usually need more insulation under the floor slab, on the walls, and under the roof. Possibly even better windows. In addition, everything must be done very precisely; there must be no gaps, cracks in foils, etc. I wanted to express that the difference hardly exists in practice; it only really shows on the certificate from the energy consultant and on the bill from the general contractor. Comfort gain or heating cost savings are virtually nonexistent.
 

haydee

2019-01-11 18:07:08
  • #2


I am aware that the Energy Saving Regulation is not KFW 55, but many manufacturers offer KFW 55 as standard and no longer have Energy Saving Regulation in their program. Especially in the timber frame sector.
 

ares83

2019-01-11 18:58:45
  • #3
The KFW 55 standard is something I cannot observe like that, at least not in the single-family house sector here in the area, and timber framing is still more of a marginal phenomenon, definitely not more than 10%. When the KfW still offered interesting conditions in 2016/17, some built KFW 55, we did too. The builders who are currently building are mostly building to the Energy Saving Ordinance standard again.
 

haydee

2019-01-11 20:59:44
  • #4
When we searched, the timber frame companies we contacted did not offer houses with the Energy Saving Ordinance. KFW 55 or upgrading to KFW 40. And they were not just regional companies Weberhaus, Schwörerhaus, Hanse Haus, Albert-Haus, Rensch-Haus, Kampa, Streif Haus and some others.

For solid houses, it looked different.
 

Lumpi_LE

2019-01-11 22:55:13
  • #5
It is hardly possible to build worse with a timber frame. The 25-year-old timber frame house of my parents would also easily meet the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 with new windows and a heat pump, photovoltaic panels on the roof and then it’s KfW 55.
 

Nordlys

2019-01-12 00:01:46
  • #6
My position is that increasing insulation standards due to CO2 reduction leads to an unreasonable increase in building costs, ventilation systems, photovoltaic systems, blower door tests, etc. This drives up rents. Not good. K.
 

Similar topics
12.05.2014KfW 70 without ventilation system107
19.06.2015Build according to KFW 70 or the Energy Saving Ordinance 201442
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
06.08.2015Photovoltaics for hot water26
19.10.2015New energy saving regulation from 2016 -> What to build?30
23.10.2015Energy Saving Ordinance 2014 - Gas boiler without solar?38
19.04.20165.5 hours of conversation. Diffusion open or closed?33
23.02.2016Photovoltaic + Battery - Which System - Experiences?17
24.02.2016Construction costs to achieve KFW 55 funding29
06.04.2016Financing for 15 or 20 years? Photovoltaics via KFW?10
11.02.2017KfW loan in 2017 for a house under the 2016 Energy Saving Ordinance17
20.10.2017Roof with photovoltaic or other investment, any experiences?19
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
09.09.2019Where is it most worthwhile to exceed the requirements of the Energy Saving Ordinance?14
29.01.2021Is the 2014 Energy Saving Ordinance a KfW standard?24
27.10.2021Photovoltaic system 120 sqm living area - cover the entire roof?45

Oben