Which heating system would you recommend to me?

  • Erstellt am 2018-01-28 16:25:47

Joedreck

2018-01-28 18:19:29
  • #1
Yes, that sounds reasonable. To really save, you have to be truly consistent in heating with wood. Otherwise, it's probably never worthwhile.
 

Alex85

2018-01-28 20:04:35
  • #2
If hydronic fireplaces, especially in new buildings, ever pay off at all. In my opinion, it is more of a hobby because you would have wood anyway. Additional costs for the fireplace, piping, control - you can heat conventionally for years with that. Not to mention the labor involved in preparing the wood and the low comfort of actually keeping it running. If you absolutely want to prepare and use the wood, have a cozy evening in front of the conventional fireplace and sell the rest. That should be much better for your wallet.
 

wrobel

2018-01-28 22:40:25
  • #3
Hello Hello

I would recommend your personal favorite.

I have installed several similar systems among customers. Usually without a gas connection.
Possibly also worth considering.
Dimension the buffer larger - costs almost nothing extra
Collector area over 20m2 - possibly use the innovation funding.

The power consumption of the pump should not differ much from that of the blower motor on the gas boiler.

Olli
 

wrobel

2018-01-28 22:56:37
  • #4
Morning again

Why is it that with a biomass heating system people always think about "being worth it" or "profitability"?
In topics like a kitchen island or the third bathroom, these questions never come up.

Olli
 

ares83

2018-01-28 23:19:12
  • #5
Exaggerated: Because a heater has a purpose --> to warm the house, and to do so cheaply. I don't want to see the thing, hear it, or deal with it daily, not even monthly.

The other questions are about things you want to deal with daily, also concerning aesthetics and usability.
 

Tego12

2018-01-29 07:00:45
  • #6
The standard Nibe from Viebrockhaus is an exhaust air heat pump... Just google it, these units are basically pure electric heaters, not recommended for non-passive houses.

Water-carrying fireplace plus gas boiler... Too expensive. You will never recover the additional costs for the water-carrying part, even with practically free wood... plus it makes the system unnecessarily complicated and therefore more expensive in maintenance and replacement eventually. If you want a fireplace, build one without this complicated connection and control.

For comparison, kitchen and heating... No comment, apples and oranges and so on...
 

Similar topics
30.04.2013Wood or stone around the pool?15
23.02.2015Air-water heat pump with solar thermal and fireplace? Cost/benefit/meaning34
03.12.2015Combination of air source heat pump and water-carrying fireplace14
18.03.2016brown spots above the fireplace10
15.05.2016Experiences with fireplace with water jacket34
30.06.2016Fireplace for KFW 55 house22
11.06.2019Is there a warranty also on heating / air pump?13
22.01.2018Fireplace or stove in the Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 for new buildings10
13.02.2022Types of windows: Plastic, wood, or aluminum? Recommendations/experiences?43
11.06.2018Is a fireplace still useful in new buildings today - experiences?63
06.06.2018Air heat pump in combination with water-carrying fireplace18
27.02.2021Controlled residential ventilation + fireplace + kitchen exhaust, does it work?56
19.02.2021Combine heat pump and water-bearing fireplace60
10.02.2021Air heat pump - increase heating11
31.05.2021House with electric heating and built-in open fireplace17
13.02.2024Heat pump is not compatible with a water-bearing fireplace144

Oben