This is the photovoltaic world from many years ago. Meanwhile, the feed-in tariff is only about a third of the self-consumption price. Modern photovoltaic design mainly focuses on self-consumption.
So if a system already yields almost 10% gross return with just the feed-in tariff, then that’s probably complaining at a high level, isn’t it?
My calculation is current and not from many years ago.
With photovoltaics, besides the pure payback calculation, there are a few considerations regarding the choice of system if it is to be installed on the roof. How do you feel about high voltages (electrosmog) above bedrooms and children’s rooms? What fire load registration will you enter? How much more expensive will the insurances be? What do you think about the look of your house? What value will your house have with a photovoltaic system in 10 years?
Sorry, but that is complete nonsense.
Electrosmog… where do you think that comes from? Although I already regret asking, I know you belong to the healthy living faction.
Fire load registration? Nonsense. Do you have a thatched roof?
Insurances? €0. It’s included everywhere, you only have to select it. Otherwise, no one forces you to take out any insurance. If you do want one, you can deduct it as operating expenses.
Appearance? I have a flat roof. Nobody sees it. Otherwise, everyone buys anthracite tiles anyway, so an all-black system is actually the optical highlight of the whole thing.
Value? Great! After 10 years, taking over a used system at the feed-in tariff rate from 10 years ago—that would be a return hit. Otherwise, you can dismantle old systems; the tiles on the pitched roof will look clearly better underneath than the tiles without photovoltaics on top.