Tips for an almost finished building plan (2-story city villa)?

I agree with everyone, there is much more benefit to be had here, the house itself is relatively large. Above all, the dressing room is just a mess, you have so much space in the master area, it needs to be better divided.

And regarding your initial post: if the laundry chute in the pantry is supposed to come down to the right of the window, it would be above/behind the bathtub on the upper floor?! That doesn't work.

I would be interested in your plan for what a "perfect" layout would look like here?!

No one intends to build a perfect wall ;-)

The design cannot be summed up with "everything is bad," that would be mean and untrue. But the design has clear weaknesses, which have been pointed out in words and pictures.

And it has a "fault" that I consider reason enough from an economic perspective to pursue a "reengineering": it roughly corresponds in living value to designs with basically similar layouts, which, however, consume almost 30 sqm less floor space. For around 50 sqm less floor area (and accordingly less money) one would get an equivalent living experience, simply by painlessly removing the surplus square meters for non-functional spaces etc.

That means: size was planned here without creating spaciousness; instead, it completely dissipates into planning error square meters. As I said, in total 50 sqm, for which you can choose whether you want to "pay out" with less budget or "live off" through a more clever room layout.

This scale seems worth reconsidering the entire plan. We are not trying to make the design look bad. With

Seeing only three "errors" in a drawing and seeing only three errors during rough construction are two different things, if not two worlds.

I mean: if you build it like that and compare the plan with the house on site, then despite measurable adherence to the plan, you will feel like: "this is not what I ordered."

You, no one here wants to do you any harm. We don't gain anything from that. You asked, and I as well as other users answered. The problem is, when laypeople create their own floor plan, they tend to struggle more with the program than really dedicating themselves 100% to the design. Until the program more or less does what you want, you know how much time and effort have been put into one corner or another, so you don’t delete it. You patch something new onto an old corner, a new idea, a few walls, without ever deleting the whole project and starting over. You can see that a) on the ground floor in the completely free and useless space in the middle, which probably came about because first the pantry was placed, then the kitchen extension on the right. It didn’t affect the living and dining area. However, on the upper floor, you should have noticed from the individual accesses, this single square meter tube in three rooms, that something didn’t fit. The disappointment is always very great when you’ve put in a lot of effort, but others just see the whole thing more neutrally.