Smarthome - General question of meaning

With the right charging station, recharging is quite quick. ;) And you don’t fully charge but only as much as you need until the next charging stop.

I mean: they are on the road for a working day and don't need to recharge in between?

Moving away a bit from the Smarthome thread… Between up to about 80% they charge between 120 and 250 kW. You don't drive completely empty and don't charge completely full. In practice, around 300 km are recharged at the Tesla station in 20 minutes. It's not a problem, most routes are shorter and more and more often you even charge at the customer's place during the appointment, then rather 50 km in an hour appointment.

If all of that is rubbish, then you can do without it. It's certainly hard, but it's possible. Go ahead. Be an example.

But never said that, but only expressed a wish and explained that, for example, the mobile phone (constant availability/dependence) has not made her happier, so why be so aggressive? Apparently, it’s only black or white now.

Honestly, I can hardly imagine any situation in which automation would be possible, at least in my life. That may be different for others, especially if you have to go to work at the same time every day.

It would rather bother me or make me feel patronized by technology, because sometimes I prefer it bright, other days darker. But of course, I can understand that people today are rather tech-savvy; I was too when I was younger. I rather consider whether something like that makes my life better or more beautiful, and I have found many other things for myself. It would also make a difference for me whether I have a "normal" single-family house or a large, fancy estate with many areas. In a normal single-family house, I don’t see the advantage. My son, for example, is self-employed online but preferred to handle such things manually and saw no benefit in automation for himself. Fortunately, everyone does as they please......

That would rather bother me or make me feel patronized by the technology, because sometimes I prefer it bright, another day rather dim.

That's exactly what I mean. I don't want the same routine all the time, I want to decide now what I want right now. And that can certainly be different from yesterday in the seemingly same situation.
Because someone asked, yes, my daily routine is very varied. For example, I have breakfast at a different time every day, but very rarely right after getting up. That's because I no longer have to work full time.
I also don't believe this automation brings us any time gain. The time you save by, for example, not having to press buttons, you need to set it all up and maintain it, reconfigure it, etc. And you have to continuously deal intensively with it if you want to set it up yourself. Or spend a lot of money on it.
Simple example: 20 years ago you had a VCR, you plugged it into the TV, put in a tape, pressed a button, and could record. Any child could do that. Today there are countless ways to record something, but all require setup and more than one button press.
Everything is becoming more complicated and time-consuming. If not in operation, then in setup.

When I read "every minute counts" early on, that shows to me that this technology does not save us time. Just go to bed 20 minutes earlier, get up 20 minutes earlier, and start the day calmly. There's also time left to press the odd button.

And you can do less and less yourself because you need more and more specialized knowledge or even specialized devices.
Cars have repeatedly been used here as a comparison. Today you need special devices and programs just to find out where the fault is, for things that a skilled hobby mechanic could have repaired himself 20 years ago. I am therefore very ambivalent about this whole development. Sure, I think it's great when my phone connects to the car and I can play my music. But just the beeping when I don't buckle up annoys me totally. That is patronization that I don't want. With the last car, you could still turn it off manually, with the current one you could only have it programmed out and no one does that.
That brings us full circle again: I want to decide when I do what, and not leave it to the technology.

It's also about the "savings potential," which can automatically be controlled, but when it has to be operated manually, it is not used - which partly would probably not be possible anyway.

But I am talking about a development that I am not experiencing (I'm just really beautifully inconsistent).

It's also about the "savings potential," which can be controlled automatically, but if it has to be operated manually, it is not used - which would probably not be possible in some cases anyway.

What can you imagine that could not be controlled manually?