Single-family house with approximately 160m2, basement + ground floor + upper floor with knee wall

  • Erstellt am 2019-03-31 19:56:43

11ant

2019-04-01 15:22:06
  • #1
In the development plan excerpt in post #1, the typical building window extensions exclusively usable for garages and carports can be seen. So the garages would probably also be allowed in the house building windows, but in reality, I simply don't see any space for it there.
 

bubbas

2019-04-01 21:02:48
  • #2

You are right. I have to see if I can still replan something there.


Yes, the north side is exactly the way it is because of these considerations and the location of the garage. Maybe the entrance can still be moved to the east, then a different layout would result.


The room downstairs will probably be used more as a guest room at the moment so that the room upstairs functions as the study.


Yes, we are also not happy with the entrance yet; it is pressed so close to the garage driveway. An entrance to the east would possibly be possible.


You’re probably right here; I have to rethink it.


Yes, I can still change that; then it is less convoluted.


Well, when you cook fish or fry something, it smells good but quite intense...


I once looked into the state building code of BW; it says here: “Garages, greenhouses and buildings without habitable rooms with a wall height of up to 3 m and a wall area of up to 25 m²,”
That means you can go up to 3 m high, but we still have to consider if we need that. The idea was just that the somewhat higher garage on the north side does not create a problem, but maybe you would have a bit more space.


So far, in discussions, I haven’t had any objections regarding the 1m distance from the street to the terrace. Is there a rule somewhere for this?


Yes, we have already been with an architect and various builders. At the moment, we are working with a construction supervisor who does the planning with an architect. But naturally, not everything is settled yet.


In the development plan, it is mentioned that the building windows are arranged checkerboard-like to allow every house the view between the other two houses to the south. For this reason, the building window probably resulted. However, I don’t find it ideal either...


Well, with the planned KNX installation about 150 cables will run into the basement (star cabling and bus system, network, lighting, multimedia, etc.). For this reason, it seems most flexible to proceed this way; then it’s also easier to lay further cables, etc. But yes, the shaft is a bit annoying...


Unfortunately, it is a premise; the development plan says about this: “Covered parking spaces (carports) and garages are only permitted within the buildable lot areas as well as in the designated areas for this purpose.”


The extractor hoods I have seen so far are quite loud when really sucking, and there are noises when cooking. But well, if "modern" kitchen means "open" kitchen, then we will rather stay with the classic kitchen. Then you can leave the sliding door open and have a bit of an "open" kitchen or close it as needed.


Thanks for the calculation. 365 m² is registered in the land register.
According to the calculations, you would have to make the house much smaller in order to have a terrace, a garage, and a driveway?
If you look at the neighbors, nobody seems to have complied with that. But you probably have to clear that with the building application. Or what do you think?


Yes, I would want to allow a little more than 2m for the interior height, but that is okay. Maybe I marked it a bit too high.


Not yet convinced by the open kitchen but thanks for the thread. We will check it out; maybe we will like something better than what we have planned now. So far, the kitchen is only figuratively planned to see how much space you would have.


Exactly right. Garages and carports are only allowed at the marked sites or in the building window.
 

11ant

2019-04-01 22:48:10
  • #3
150 cables? - with 150 cores you can fully automate a three-family house if you know how. But of course, it also works with an arms race of materials. However, I was rather referring to the impractical masonry solution. In the worst case, I would use a precast chimney, but usually rather drywall. Beware of overwhelming run-of-the-mill construction contractors!
 

rick2018

2019-04-01 23:16:36
  • #4
150 cables for KNX, lighting, LAN, multimedia... as written by bubbas I find it within limits though on the upper end. A lot adds up just for KNX if you want it smart. Plus the LAN. We will have almost 150 LAN ports.
 

11ant

2019-04-02 02:35:33
  • #5
I appreciate the benefits of structured cabling, but with brains and basic knowledge in old-fashioned telecommunications, many things can be solved with fewer twisted pairs. One hundred and fifty times four twisted pairs already weigh more than an adequately clogged drainpipe.
 

bubbas

2019-04-02 06:41:29
  • #6
: Then you mean the laundry chute. Yes, I still have to look into that; at the moment I’ve just drawn it carelessly in the corner. I think it can be accommodated in the wall or in the technical shaft. Yes, 150 cables is more of my upper estimate. But I can manage about 90 with the planning. Of course, you can save some by using all the individual wires of the cables. But I think that doesn't exactly make it maintenance-safe. We will most likely subcontract the electrical work ourselves if the electrician from the construction supervision can’t do it. But that still needs to be discussed.
 

Similar topics
01.09.2016Is Smarthome KNX automation possible based on the floor plan?81
20.07.2025How to smartly wire door/window contacts/buttons/LEDs? HA vs Dali-2 vs KNX etc.13

Oben