Should the house be planned by a general contractor or architects?

  • Erstellt am 2016-04-04 19:25:59

Bieber0815

2016-07-26 23:10:43
  • #1
The contract can provide for an assignment of claims as security. This means the general contractor/trade contractor assigns claims they have against their subcontractors to the buyer. The buyer can then directly approach the subcontractors. Important: This should be designed so that one preserves their claims against the general contractor/trade contractor. A warranty bond helps against insolvency.
 

Peanuts74

2016-07-27 07:23:26
  • #2
Ok, thank you very much. However, I believe a construction company that goes bankrupt in the current times must be very bad.
 

andimann

2016-07-27 09:44:55
  • #3
Hi,



No, it doesn’t have to be bad, it can even be very good. Someone just has to want to cash out. This works like this:

    [*]make a big profit
    [*]transfer everything to the wife
    [*]let the company go bankrupt with shady actions, but the money is protected from creditors' access
    [*]all complaints and warranty cases are settled, since the company is bankrupt

    [*]either enjoy the money in peace or reopen the business under a new name after a few months

No idea if this still works today, but in the 70s and 80s this procedure was apparently common in the construction industry. Entire districts were built this way in the Münsterland!

Best regards,

Andreas
 

Musketier

2016-07-27 09:47:43
  • #4
Back then, however, there were not so many sources of information.
In addition, at least on paper, a new managing director is needed or better yet, one who is responsible for the insolvency in the first place.
 

jaeger

2016-08-15 14:16:46
  • #5


Does the architectural service also come from the general contractor, or did you have a design plan made by an architect and then contacted various general contractors?

I am currently facing the same question because the first designs from the general contractors are not very promising. There are still a few open, but somehow I am now leaning towards the design planning from the architect. Another advantage would be that you then have a uniform plan and can better compare the offers from the various general contractors.
 

Peanuts74

2016-08-16 06:27:40
  • #6
We had drawn up a plan ourselves and then requested quotes for it. All the GCs did the same; some had only made minor adjustments...
 

Similar topics
23.10.2008We need an architect - or should I do it myself?14
02.01.2009Experiences with architects15
19.03.2013Turnkey or build with architects?19
21.07.2013Cost estimates from two architects differ greatly!10
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
30.01.2014Architect's cost estimation15
21.08.2014Construction costs when building with architects. What does your experience say?18
11.02.2015Cost planning for a single-family house including land, additional costs, architect32
19.12.2014Finding architects - but how?26
08.09.2015Massive house by the architect, approximate costs?16
23.09.2015Responsibilities of the Architect in Tendering18
29.10.2015Is it normal for the purchase of land to be tied to an architect?16
19.01.2016Construction project with architects31
10.03.2017Payment of the architect16
12.10.2017Cost of enclosed space. First draft discussed with architects27
27.10.2017Construction description by architects: Who has experience?13
07.02.2018Architect's suggestions disappointing - What next?32
16.02.2018Stress with the architect - naively signed the preliminary contract17

Oben