Cchand1986 2018-10-08 13:36:37#1The most sustainable option would of course be to buy what already exists instead of building new... as with everything else.
The most sustainable option would of course be to buy what already exists instead of building new... as with everything else.
DDirkB 2018-10-08 13:51:55#2You are right. But to my knowledge, I can only afford a renovation, not one to real new-build standards.
You are right. But to my knowledge, I can only afford a renovation, not one to real new-build standards.
DDirkB 2018-10-08 14:30:52#4That is all still in planning. But existing real estate currently costs an “insane“ amount of money here. (Empty plots unfortunately too) * there are certainly many other areas / prices in the world
That is all still in planning. But existing real estate currently costs an “insane“ amount of money here. (Empty plots unfortunately too) * there are certainly many other areas / prices in the world
CCaspar2020 2018-10-08 14:32:33#5But to my knowledge, I can only afford a renovation to real new-build standards. So it also has to be cheap? Then you have a conflict of objectives; unfortunately, renewable materials are often a bit more expensive. KFW gladly, but it’s not about calculation but about the actual consumption. I don’t understand that. Energetically, you can predict quite well what will ultimately be consumed (individual requirements excepted).
But to my knowledge, I can only afford a renovation to real new-build standards. So it also has to be cheap? Then you have a conflict of objectives; unfortunately, renewable materials are often a bit more expensive. KFW gladly, but it’s not about calculation but about the actual consumption. I don’t understand that. Energetically, you can predict quite well what will ultimately be consumed (individual requirements excepted).
OObstlerbaum 2018-10-08 14:37:07#6I don't understand that. Energetically, you can calculate quite well in advance what will be consumed in the end (except for individual demands). I assume that he really wants to have a low consumption, instead of just fictitiously reaching a KfW limit.
I don't understand that. Energetically, you can calculate quite well in advance what will be consumed in the end (except for individual demands). I assume that he really wants to have a low consumption, instead of just fictitiously reaching a KfW limit.