Recommendations for solid wood house providers in Schleswig-Holstein

  • Erstellt am 2020-07-21 22:25:33

11ant

2020-07-24 12:07:09
  • #1
But this must stay between us, that I cannot play an instrument Since a misconception is more likely here, it would be helpful to know it.
 

bauking01

2020-07-24 20:35:29
  • #2


On the one hand, I like the appearance of wooden houses better than that of conventional stone houses. Above all, I am drawn to the modern cubic look with weathered wood. However, such houses probably cost significantly more than the common wooden houses like Swedish houses. I probably won't be able to convince my wife of a too modern look.

Besides, I generally appreciate the positive ecological effect and the healthy climate of a wooden house. What worries me, however, is the noisiness.

So much for my reasons.
 

pagoni2020

2020-07-24 20:45:18
  • #3
What do you know about what a bouquet of pink carnations can do! ...which both won’t necessarily occur just because it is a wooden house.
 

haydee

2020-07-24 21:15:06
  • #4
Stone houses can have any shape and can be clad with wood.

Wood and ecology is a lot of advertising. The wood does not come from the mixed forest around the corner. The wood was not gently cut by hand and pulled to the nearest path with a logging horse.

The climate in the wooden house can be good, but it doesn't have to be. I cannot distinguish between stone, timber frame, and solid wood.

Wooden houses are not necessarily more prone to noise.

What do you understand by wooden house?
 

Daniel-Sp

2020-07-24 21:24:41
  • #5

The facade is ventilated and hung in front when executed with good quality. The design is up to you. Whether Swedish style or cubic style doesn't matter. What matters is the actual wall. But you can't see that. Therefore, you cannot say anything about the quality of the workmanship just by looking at the facade. There are high-quality executed houses with Swedish style and "simple" houses with a high-quality looking cubic style.
You should deepen your knowledge of the subject a bit more.
 

11ant

2020-07-24 21:40:42
  • #6

I don’t know much about your wife, but regarding the other points I can already tell you: I have three pieces of good news for you.
1. Whether a house is "constructed" from stone or wood, today even a layperson can no longer tell by looking. I have been dealing with this for four decades and, in most cases, I wouldn’t bet on it in today’s new residential areas. In very few cases, precisely the timber frame panel prefabricated house—which you trust the least—has the edge when it comes to the structural feasibility of many drawn fantasies. But these cases are too few to speak of a system superiority here. Over 80% of building ideas can be convincingly implemented with all construction methods alike.
2. Mistakes with acoustic consequences can be made with all construction methods; the construction of various connection details is decisive, but no method has a system-related disadvantage. Not only visually do I often hesitate to bet, acoustically—and, by the way, also with regard to the climate, it’s similar. So basically, a builder doesn’t have to be discouraged just because his alleged "royal road" construction method offers only a narrow range of regional providers.
3. Space and indoor climate is a complex entity. For example, clay plaster in a stone house can make you just as happy as cork flooring in the "Mondholzjurte." Also, in terms of building biology, there are many shades of gray between paradise and doom.

So detach yourself—at least as an experiment in thought—from the construction method and let’s focus on your dream house, for example from the perspective of its form. In the end, I see three winners: builder, wife, and father-in-law—all three happy and satisfied with the same house. I have seen this happen here so many times already; one more time we manage it, it really won’t make a difference anymore.
 

Similar topics
22.07.2013Brick or wooden house11
16.03.2021Ventilated, suspended facade instead of ETICS?29
22.01.2017Single-skin vs. double-skin facade23
24.05.2017Gray spots on the originally white facade17
01.10.2017Passive wooden house with swimming pond and garden sauna24
04.04.2017Which facade is better?33
19.06.2017Solid house stone by stone, the ecological wooden house or...19
16.07.2017Empty facade, highlight32
13.11.2017Facade according to DIN18202 flawless41
26.01.2019Is a turnkey wooden house possible under €300,000?43
16.02.2019Manufacturing S-shaped facade - construction method22
21.08.2019Cost of clinker brick veneer facade?18
05.09.2019What must be decided regarding the facade before the shell construction?10
19.05.2021Substructure facade rhombus battens without insulation19
21.08.2020How to clad a projecting plinth (facade-basement wall)24
23.09.2020Splash guard for facade and transition from lawn to flower bed24
23.05.2021Ventilated façade: advantages/disadvantages? Pest problems?13
11.09.2021Which Cat cables should be installed on the facade? Problems with moisture?29
25.01.2024Is a solid house energetically much worse than a wooden house?15

Oben