somehow that can’t be right.
I seriously wonder what is wrong with you. You have no clue about valuation, but you happily speculate blindly.
at €350/sqm the demand must be so enormous that the purchase price surely has to be rounded up rather than down.
Nonsense. The original poster made it crystal clear that he can spend €150,000 all-in for land acquisition. Ergo, he has to buy the Porsche with a turbo (south-facing), which unfortunately has a significant rear damage (small garden or only usable with increased capital investment) and where it’s not even certain if it can be completely fixed (residual risk that the garden stays as is and the value of the plot
won’t be increased by leveling (sic!)), for well below the Schwacke value. Otherwise, that Porsche will end up draining the wallet – it has happened before.
If the seller values the vehicle significantly higher, they just won’t (quickly) agree – no matter where the Schwacke value lies or whether the seller’s price setting is realistic. Then the original poster has to (or can) look for another vehicle – namely the Golf Plus (north-facing) for €130,000, which is on sale without accident damage and is immediately drivable.
Understand the principle?
the plots are of course smaller so that someone can even afford them. €130,000 is still a lot for the plot.
Please take a look at a land value map of NRW..
Everything west of Wickede is automatically +€150 and these are partly very old development areas. In the Ruhr area or the Lev/K region there are commercial areas (!) where easily +€100 is asked for. You
can compare that 10 times with your meadow in SH – it only remains pointless. Completely.
I once calculated that €10,000 more for the plot price would mean 4 km less driving distance over 20 years.
Understandable so far, but you don’t just drive to work and people generally work longer than 20 years. If both partners work, the calculation for the green meadow gets even worse.
so if I have to pay €50,000 more for the plot but have 20 km less commute to work, in the end I come out about even. And that can justify the expensive plots. Cheap plots in the middle of nowhere with 30 km commute to work are basically worthless. The money is eventually spent, while high plot costs remain (unless the area becomes worthless due to certain events like airport flight paths or major companies all move away).
Exactly. Incidentally, in SH you have a much higher risk that your residential area will lose value in 30 years than one in NRW with a value of +/- €350.
still supply and demand apply. If every "middle-class employee"
Baseless accusation. €350 is towards the upper limit even for NRW and even in metropolitan areas. But I neither know the income, the employment situation nor the other family/financial situation of the original poster well enough to attribute such a statement to him – let alone generalize it.
can pay a sqm price of €350, the income there must be better. Because we here cannot fork out €130,000 net for a plot. We paid just under €63,000 net (net = without additional costs, but with VAT...) and are already solidly in the upper middle range here due to the location and position.
Your location is not decent and not remotely comparable to the original poster’s location –
that can be said for sure without even knowing your plot. To find a comparable location in SH you have to look in Lübeck, Kiel, Sylt or north of Hamburg for plots costing around €350/sqm. Your location is miles away from that – geographically as well as especially infrastructure-wise.
as said, in the end high sqm prices are advantageous because the value does not get lost and you also get a “consideration” for it (e.g., central location, short commutes, major industry or the like nearby) and such a house is always easier to sell.
Also better (higher!) loan collateral value, and in case of doubt also selling at a profit after 30 years even with a not fully paid-off mortgage. But to understand that, you have to mentally detach yourself from the green meadow.
Best regards
Dirk Grafe